This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Assessment-Firm-Dissolution of the firm is intimated to the Assessing Officer-Notices issued in the name of non-existing entity and passing order-Without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. [S.133(6), 147]
Jainam Exports v. ITO (2023)108 ITR 1 (Surat)(Trib)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Pursuant to direction of Tribunal-No direction of Tribunal to tax sum in question in hands of company-Reopening of assessment to bring sum to tax in hands of company is not sustainable. [S. 132(4), 148, 150]
Dy. CIT v. Capital Power Systems Ltd. (2023)108 ITR 4 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)
S. 147: Reassessment-Depreciation-Assets purchased from Subsidy-Change of opinion-Reassessment is bad in law-Subsidy-Renewable energy scheme to set up small hydro projects-Capital in nature-Not income-[S. 2(24)(xviii), 115JB, 143(3), 148]
Puri Oil Mills Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)108 ITR 107 (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice in the name of dead person-Expired before passing of the assessment order-No notice is served on legal heir-Assessment is non est and bad in law.[S. 143(1),144, 148, 159]
Motilal Hastimaji Bothra (Late) v.ITO (2023)108 ITR 166 (Mum)(Trib)
S. 145 : Method of accounting-Accrual income-Electricity company-Late payment surcharge-Taxed in earlier and subsequent years on receipt basis-Accounting Standard 9-Not to be taxed on accrual basis.[S. 4]
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v.Add. CIT (2023)108 ITR 329 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 145 : Method of accounting-No defects in the books of account-Ad-hoc estimate of profit is not justified. [S. 133A, 145 (3)
Asst. CIT v. Friends Medicos (2023)108 ITR 279 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Final assessment order was passed without incorporating directions of Dispute Resolution Panel-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to pass order incorporating Dispute Resolution Panel’s directions. [S.144C(13)]
Hitachi Astemo Haryana P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)108 ITR 47 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)
S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Non-Resident-Assessment-Eligible assessee —Order under Section 92CA is not prerequisite in case of Non-resident.[S.92CA]
Abrar Fakirmohmmad Shaikh v. ITO (IT) (2023)108 ITR 127/ 226 TTJ 721 ( Pune) (Trib)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Document Identification Number-Circular making generation and quoting of mandatory —Assessment order invalid and deemed to have never been passed.[S.119]
Rhone Associates P. Ltd. v.ACIT (2023)108 ITR 16 (SN)/(2024) 204 ITD 136 (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Document Identification Number-Failure to allot and mention in assessment order-Assessment order deemed never to have been passed —Central Board Of Direct Taxes Circular No. 19 Of 2019, Dated 14-8-2019-Order is bad in law-Additional ground is admitted-Order is quashed. [S.153A, 254(1)]
Panna Lal and Co. v. Dy. CIT (2023)108 ITR 46 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)