This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-House wife-Property purchased by husband-Joint holder-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S.69B, 148, 148(A)(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Kalpita Arun Lanjekar v. ITO (2024) 298 Taxman 626 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-Order is quashed and set aside-Directed to pass a speaking order. [S. 68, 143(1), 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226
Vijay Steel Traders v. ACIT (2024) 298 Taxman 758 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Corpus donation-Revenue audit objection-Reopening is justified-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 11, 143(3) 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Sree Narayana Guru Memorial Educational and Cultural Trust v. ACIT (2024) 298 Taxman 483 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Directed to file proper reply.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Venkataramachettiar Manoharan v. ITO (2024) 298 Taxman 19 / 465 ITR 755 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Capital gains-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Mira Bhavin Mehta v. ITO (2024) 298 Taxman 460 / 464 ITR 778 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Profit attribution-Revision order is set aside by the Tribunal-Change of opinion-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed-DTAA-India-Malaysia. [S.143(3), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 263,art. 5, Art. 226]
MFE Formwork Technology SDN. BHD v. Dy.CIT(2024) 298 Taxman 790 /464 ITR 645 (Bom)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Issuing third notice and furnishing specific details of transaction which was subject matter of earlier notice-Failure to explain or substantiate genuineness of transaction in reply-Notice and order for issuance of reassessment notice is held to be valid by the High Court-SLP dismissed as not pressed. [S. 147, 148, 148A(d), Art. 136]
Saroj Chandna v. ITO (2024) 298 Taxman 647 (SC) Editorial : Saroj Chandna v. ITO (2022) 448 ITR 28 / 218 DTR 41/ 328 CTR 804/ (2023) 291 Taxman 233 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Limitation-Time limit to issue a notice under section 148 had already expired on 1-4-2021 and thus, reopening of assessment for assessment year 2013-14 after 31-3-2021 was invalid, without jurisdiction and barred by limitation. [S. 149, Art. 226]
Amol Ramrao Dahale v. Pr. CCIT (2024) 298 Taxman 467 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Seized documents, computers, hard disks etc.-Not taken serious measures to release the documents seized-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 147, Art. 226]
Francisco Xavier Pacheco v. State of Goa (2024) 298 Taxman 660 /339 CTR 572 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Dissolved company-Notice and assessment order is quashed.[S. 2(31), 143(3), 147, Art.226]
Jitendra Chandralal Navlani v. UOI (2024) 298 Taxman 15 (Bom.)(HC)