S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is quashed. [S. 148]
Asst. CIT (OSD) v. S. S. Gas Lab Asia P. Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 482 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is quashed. [S. 148]
Asst. CIT (OSD) v. S. S. Gas Lab Asia P. Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 482 (Delhi) (Trib)S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Legal issue-Can be raised at any time-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to consider additional ground of limitation on Dispute Resolution Panel’s Direction. [S. 92CA, 153, 254(1), ITATR.11]
Eaton Power Quality P. Ltd. v. Dy. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 195 (Chennai) (Trib)S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Rejection of books of account-Estimate of gross profit-No purchases from shell companies-Declared greater profit from earlier years-No addition is warranted.
Asst. CIT v. Montecarlo Construction Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 411 (Ahd) (Trib)S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Information in Annual Information return is not incriminating material-Addition is deleted.[S. 5, 50C, 132]
Pravinchandra R. Patel v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.) Ansuben P.Patel (Smt) v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.) Neothech Education Foundation v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Factum of amalgamation intimated to Assessing Officer with request to cancel Permanent Account Number of amalgamating company-Notice in name of non-existent entity-Not sustainable.[S. 147]
Asst. CIT v. Vibhu International Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 6 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded-Factual misstatements and inaccuracies-Sanction of commissioner without proper application of mind-Dispute Resolution Panel-Admitting errors-Reassessment is bad in law.[S.144C, 148, 151]
Cricket South Africa (NPC) v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2023)107 ITR 93 (SN)/226 TTJ 936 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-Settlement Of Case-Settlement Commission passing order settling case-Binding on department-Assessing Officer has no power to reopen assessment for year forming part of Settlement-Recovery of tax-Companies-Insolvency resolution-Resolution plan as approved by committee of creditors approved by National Company Law Tribunal-Binding on all Parties-Dues not forming part of resolution plan stand extinguished-Department has no power to reopen assessment [S.148, 245C(1), 245D(4)]
Asst. CIT v. Pradip Overseas Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 60 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded-No addition is made on the basis of recorded reasons-Addition is made on other grounds which are not part of the recorded reasons-Reassessment is quashed.[S. 148]
Bharti Singh (Smt.) v. Asst. CIT (2023)107 ITR 26 (SN)(Amritsar) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Borrowed satisfaction-Contrary to facts-All information was available while passing the original assessment order-Approval without application of mind-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 132, 133A, 148, 151, 153A, 153C]
Evershine Recreation P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 65 (SN)(Chd) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Borrowed satisfaction-Reassessment is not valid-Approval is not valid [S. 132, 133A,148, 151, 153A, 153C]
Evershine Recreation P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 65 (SN) (Chd.)(Trib.)