This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order and on merit affirmed by High Court. [80IA(4)(ii), 260A]
PCIT v. BT Global Communications India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 328/337 CTR 179 /466 ITR 714(Delhi)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Shares at premium-Confirmation was filed-Assessing Officer passed the order after verification-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision is affirmed. [S. 56(2) (viib), 143(3), 260A]
PCIT v. Trojan Developers (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 177 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Depreciable assets-Block of assets-Claim of set off of brought forward long term capital loss against short term capital gain under section 50-Plausible view-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 2(11), 32,72,143(3), 260A]
PCIT v. National Dairy Development Board (2024) 297 Taxman 306 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business expenditure-Specific query was raised in the original assessment proceedings-Mere failure to issue notice under section 133(6) did not warrant exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 37(1), 133(6), 143(3), Art. 136]
PCIT v. R. K. Jain Infra Projects (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 369 /464 ITR 584 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. R. K. Jain Infra Projects (P.) Ltd(2023) 293 Taxman 465 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay 4 years and 100 days-Failed to give any adequate or sufficient reasons-Appeal was dismissed as time barred-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]
CIT (IT) v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 371/463 ITR 63 /337 CTR 1 (SC) Editorial : CIT (IT) v. Bharti Airtel Ltd (2024) 159 taxmann.com 315 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Central Processing Centre (CPC)-Unable to input it foreign bank account details by imputing SWIFT code and IBAN as per ITR-Bank account is validated by revenue on 7-7-2023 and refund was made in October 2023 without interest-High Court directed the Revenue to pay interest on refund amount at rate specified in section 244A from 1-5-2022 to 5-10-2023. [S. 143(1), Art. 226]
Coda Global LLC v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024) 297 Taxman 299/339 CTR 314 /466 ITR 687 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 237 : Refunds-Pendency of appeal before DRP-No recoverable demand-Refund cannot be withheld to be adjustment towards anticipated demand. [S.144C(5), 220,254(1), Art.226]
IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 297 Taxman 105/338 CTR 869 (Karn)(HC)
S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Pendency of appeal-Directed to the recovery till disposal of the appeal by the CIT(A). [S. 50C, 56(2)(x), 250, Art. 226]
Namudha v. ITO (2024) 297 Taxman 243 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 194I : Deduction at source-Rent-Storage charges-Storage tanks-Did not qualify either as land or as building-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 201(IA), (260A]
CIT (TDS) v. B. Arunkunar Trading Ltd (2024) 297 Taxman 567 /465 ITR 748/339 CTR 49 (Bom)(HC)