This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Bogus entry-No transaction is carried out-Order disposing objection and notice is quashed.[S.68, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Tirupati Trading Corporation v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 535 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order passed without providing information gathered from investigation wing-Order and subsequent notice is quashed and set aside.[S. 2((15),12A, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Chotanagpur Diocesson Trust Asson. v. UOI (2024) 296 Taxman 16 /464 ITR 748 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Annual subscription fee to club-Capital or revenue-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 37(1), 143(1), 148, Art. 226]

Swiss Re Services India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 190 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Professional fees-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 40(a)(i), 148, Art. 226]

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 117 / 338 CTR 220(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained money-Loans and advances-Investment in Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs)-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 69A, 148, Art. 226]

Koa Investment Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 311 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained investments-Development agreement-Specific query in the course of assessment proceedings-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.69A, 148, Art. 226]

Bharatkumar Dinubhai Patel v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 128 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unsecured loan-Accommodation entries-No tangible material-Suspicion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objections are quashed.[S. 68, 148, Art. 226]

Bhagwati Polyfill (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 434 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Amortisation of preliminary expenses-Initial Public Offering-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 35D, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Palco Recycle Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 44 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Redemption of preference shares-Provisions of section 47(iv) are not applicable to redemption of preference shares-Order of Assessing Officer allowing the loss is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 2(47) 47, 47 (iv), 47(v), 148, Art. 136]

NFAC v. Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. (2024) 296 Taxman 575 (SC) Editorial : Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd v. NFAC (2023) 157 taaxmann.com 442 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Right shares-Valuation-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 56(2)(vii)(b), 148, Art. 136]

ACIT v. Lakshdeep Investment & Finance (P.) Ltd. (2024) 462 ITR 499/296 Taxman 573 (SC) Editorial : Lakshdeep Investments & Finance (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)455 ITR 639 / 293 Taxman 369 (Bom.)(HC)