This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Capital gains -Profit on sale of property used for residence -Capital gains not deposited in CGAS -Capital gain was invested in purchase/construction of residential house within time limit prescribed under section 54(1) –Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 139(1)]
Sarita Gupta (Ms.) v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 373 / 204 ITD 299 (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 263: Commissioner -Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Long term capital gains- [S. 45, 115O, 115P]
Bijni Dooars Tea Co. Ltd. v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 105/ 204 ITD 75/ 228 TTJ 552 (Kol)(Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Revision on the basis of investigation/ enquiries conducted post completion of assessment -Sale of shares -Long term capital gains – Reassessment order is invalid. [S. 143(3)]
Kaustubh Gupta v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 10(SN)(Delhi) (Trib)
S. 251: Appeal -Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers- Co-terminus -Fresh claim of deduction- Allowed deduction. [S.80C]
Ajay Sharma v. Jt. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 268 (Amritsra)(Trib)
S.251: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers -No power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution –CIT(A) is directed to pass speaking order on merits. [S. 92C, 92CA(2)]
DSI-Bridgecon India (P.) ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 205 ITD 136 (Delhi) (Trib)
S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay -DTAA -India -UAE.[S. 9(1)(vi), 201(1), 201(IA), Art. 7]
Dy. CIT v. Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 689 (Ahd) (Trib)
S. 195 :Deduction at source – Non-resident – Other sums – Reimbursement of cost- Matter remanded -DTAA -India -Germany. [S. 9(1)(vii),197, 248]
BASF Catalysts India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 668 (Chennai)(Trib)
S. 195: Deduction at source – Non-resident – Other sums – Resident of Canada entitled to benefit under DTAA -DTAA -India -Canada.[S.195(2), Art.]
Dy. CIT v. Foundation Co. of Canada Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 590 (Delhi) (Trib)
S.153A: Assessment -Search -Less than 50 lakhs -Assessment beyond six years is bad in law. [S.69, 132]
Kawaljit Singh v. ACIT (2024) 204 ITD 307 (Chd)(Trib)
S.151 : Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Sanction for issue of notice -The absence of proper authorization from the designated officer renders the notice of reassessment under section 148 null and void from the outset, warranting its dismissal.[S. 127, 147, 148]
Chirag Mishrimal Hirani v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 40 (SN) (Surat)(Trib)