S. 147 : Reassessment -Borrowed satisfaction- The reopening of an assessment solely on borrowed satisfaction, devoid of independent scrutiny, lacks validity.[S. 148]
Dinesh Gangwal v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 42 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment -Borrowed satisfaction- The reopening of an assessment solely on borrowed satisfaction, devoid of independent scrutiny, lacks validity.[S. 148]
Dinesh Gangwal v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 42 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)S.147: Reassessment – Information from investigation wing -Borrowed satisfaction -Cash deposits -Reassessment order is set aside. [S. 143(3), 148]
Ujjala Suppliers P. Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 16 (SN)(Kol)(Trib)S. 147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – No failure to disclose material facts -Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148 149(1)(b)]
Dy. CIT v. Satya Securities Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 700 (Mum) (Trib)S. 145: Method of accounting -Addition cannot be made on account of Low GP.
Dy. CIT v. Kortek Electronics (India) Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 276 (Delhi) (Trib)S.144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel -Passing draft assessment order -AO passed final assessment order instead of draft assessment order -Invalid order -Order quashed. [S.92CA(3), 144C(4), 153]
Panasonic Life Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 205 ITD 139/ 227 TTJ 367 (Mum)(Trib)S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel -Objection is filed before DRP after due date of time allowed for filing objections- AO should carry proceedings to finalize assessment order as per provisions of section -Assessment order was barred by limitation and treated as void. [S.92CA(3), 144C(4), 153]
Mavenir UK Holdings v. ACIT [2024] 205 ITD 1 (Delhi) (Trib)S.143(3) :Assessment – Signing of an assessment order by Assessing Officer is a mandatory – Not curable procedural defect -Unsigned assessment order is invalid. [S. 282(2) 282A, 292B, Rule 127A, Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Order -XX Rule 3]
Reuters Asia Pacific Ltd. v. DCIT [2024] 205 ITD 31/ 228 TTJ 165/110 ITR 609 (Mum)(Trib)S. 143(3): Assessment – Person -Amalgamation- The amalgamation of the assessee company with another entity leads to the cessation of the assessee company’s status as a legal entity under section 2(31) of the Act- Substantive illegality and not a procedural violation- Order is invalid. [S. 2(31)]
Solvent Real Estate P. Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 52 (SN.) (Kol) (Trib)S. 143(3) : Assessment- Document Identification Number – Order passed manually without DIN, assessment order was to be treated as never been issued. [S. 271(1)(c)]
Sad Bhawna v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 45 (SN) / 204 ITD 785 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 143(3) : Assessment- Document Identification Number -Order without DIN – Order is set-aside. [S. 153C]
Sharda Devi Bajaj (Smt.) v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 131/ 204 ITD 302 (Delhi)(Trib)/Sundar Lal Bajaj v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 131/ 204 ITD 302 (Delhi)( Trib) Sundar Lal Bajaj, HUF v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 131/ 204 ITD 302 (Delhi)( Trib)