This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 148, Art.226]
Vijay Ramanlal Sanghvi v. ACIT (2023)457 ITR 791 /146 taxmann.com 55 (Guj)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]
AIM Fincon Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)457 ITR 737 (Guj)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Must be given an opportunity of being heard. [S. 143(3),144B(1)(xi))(b), 144B(9), Art. 226]
Sun Glory Education Foundation v. NFAC(2023)457 ITR 771/156 taxmann.com 390 (Guj)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Variation proposed in draft assessment order-Must be given an opportunity to be heard. [S. 144B(7), 144B(1)(xvi), Art. 226]
Riddhi Steel and Tube Ltd. v NFAC(2022) 145 taxmann.com 542 /(2023)457 ITR 105 (Guj)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Order passed without giving an opportunity of hearing-Order is set aside. [S. 144B(9)]
Rajubhai Bababhai Desai v. NFAC (2023)457 ITR 639 (Guj)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Request for personal hearing-Must be given opportunity of personal hearing.[S,144B(7), Art. 226]
MAP Refoils India Ltd. v. NEAC (2023)457 ITR 618 / 330 CTR 303 /155 taxmann.com 663 (Guj)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order passed without giving an opportunity-Order is set aside.[S.58, 115BBE, Art. 226]
Doddaguli Kenche Gowda Raju v. ACIT (2023)457 ITR 430 (Karn)(HC)
S. 124 : Jurisdiction of Assessing Officers-Transfer of case from Mumbai to Pune-Order of assessment by Assessing Officer of Mumbai is not valid. [S. 143(3)]
PCIT v. Capstone Securities Analysis Pvt. Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 775 / 146 taxmann.com 423(Bom)(HC)
S. 92CA : Transfer pricing-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length price-No interest was paid to creditor or supplier nor any interest has been earned from unrelated party-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 84/146 taxmann.com 131 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP dismissed, PCIT v. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.[2024] 158 taxmann.com 214 (SC). Affirmed, Boeing India Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2020) 81 ITR 94 (Delhi)(Trib)