This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Credit card processing fees-Not commission-Not liable to deduct tax at source.[S. 194H]

PCIT v. Spice Jet Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 595 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Real employer of seconded employees was Indian entity-Disallowance is not justified.[S. 192, 195]

PCIT v. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 84/146 taxmann.com 131 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP dismissed, PCIT v. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.[2024] 158 taxmann.com 214 (SC). Affirmed, Boeing India Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2020) 81 ITR 94 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Software company-Expenditure on developing new product-New product abandoned as not feasible-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

PCIT v. Trigent Software Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 765 /147 taxmann.com 52 (Bom)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed , PCIT v. Trigent Software Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 453 / 464 ITR 770 (SC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Licence fee-Allowable as deduction.

PCIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (No. 1) (2023)457 ITR 210/153 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Construction and handing over of transmission lines sub-station-Revenue expenditure.

CIT v. Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd (2023)457 ITR 246/(2022) 145 taxmann.com 276 (Mad)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-User of asset-Pollution control devices-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.

PCIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (No. 1) (2023)457 ITR 210/153 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Intangible asset-Leasehold right-Depreciation is allowable.

Bangalore International Airport Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)457 ITR 229/146 taxmann.com 206 / 335 CTR 586(Karn)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Future and options-Not claimed in the original return-Retraction in the original assessment proceedings-Tribunal affirmed the order of the CIT(A), allowing the claim.[S. 139(5), 154, 260A]

PCIT v. GGC Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 240 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Not recording satisfaction-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed. [R. 8D]

PCIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (No. 1) (2023)457 ITR 210/153 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 10(46) : Body or Authority-Specified income-Issue concluded by Supreme Court-Matter remanded to Central Board of Direct taxes. [S. 119, Art. 226]

Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur v. UOI (2023)457 ITR 57/155 taxmann.com 452 (Raj)(HC)