This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Reassessment-Reassessment pursuant to search carried out prior to 1-4-2021-Orders quashed.[S. 132, 148, Art. 226]

Shiv Vegpro Pvt. Ltd. v ACIT (2025) 477 ITR 781 (Raj)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion – Notice based on assessment order of subsequent assessment year-Non-deduction of tax at source on payment made to non-resident, short and long term gains on share transactions- Provision for warranty – Deduction u/s 35(2AB )-No independent formation of opinion by Assessing Officer based on new material-Reassessment notice quashed and set aside. [S. 35(2AB), 148, Art. 226]

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 477 ITR 725 /171 taxmann.com 729 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment – Survey-Non-resident-Permanent establishment Permanent agent- Dependant establishment-Attribution of profits – Reassessment notice was up held by the Tribunal – No substantial question of law – Appeal dismissed-Rejection of application for recall of the order was affirmed. [S. 148, 254(2), 260A, Art. 226]

GE Nuovo Pignone S.P.A. v. CIT (IT ) [2024] 167 taxmann.com 351 / (2025) 477 ITR 659 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice – Subject matter of appeal-Income which is subject matter of appeal, reference or revision – Reassessment notice is not valid [S. 11, 148, Art. 226]

Shri Shanmukhananda Fine Arts and Sangeetha Sabha v. Dy. DIT (E) (2025) 477 ITR 431 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Reassessment-Assessment of third person-Notice opportunity of hearing not mandatory for issue of notice of reassessment pursuant to search-Satisfaction note is internal communication of Department not requiring document identification number-No provision requiring supply of copy of satisfaction note to assessee with notice for reopening assessment -Writ petition dismissed. [S. 132, 148, 153A, Art. 226]

Rameshkumar Tulsidas Kaneriya v.ACIT (2025) 477 ITR 358 /172 taxmann.com 814 (Guj)(HC) Editorial :SLP rejected, Rameshkumar Tulsidas Kaneriya v.ACIT (2025] 304 Taxman 666 / 477 ITR 366 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital gains-Information from investigation unit – Penny stock – Borrowed satisfaction- Fishing inquiry not permissible-Notice quashed and set aside.[S. 10(38), 45, 148, Art. 226]

Rakesh Ramanlal Shah. v. Dy. CIT 2024] 165 taxmann.com 364 / (2025) 477 ITR 289 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP rejected Dy.CIT v. Rakesh Ramanlal Shah [2025] 477 ITR 296 / 177 taxmann.com 200 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Audit objection- No new material-Notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Adani Wilmar Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 162 taxmann.com 832 / (2025) 477 ITR 88 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years- Query raised and issue considered in assessment proceedings- Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Bharatbhai Ratanshi Shah v. ACIT [2024] 162 taxmann.com 760 /(2025) 477 ITR 72 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Reassessment-Assessment of third person-Notice opportunity of hearing not mandatory for issue of notice of reassessment pursuant to search-Satisfaction note is internal communication of Department not requiring document identification number-No provision requiring supply of copy of satisfaction note to assessee with notice for reopening assessment – SLP against High Court order dismissed. [S. 132, 148, 153A Art.136]

Rameshkumar Tulidas Kaneriya v. ACIT ( 2025) 477 ITR 366/304 Taxman 666 (SC) Editorial : Rameshkumar Tulsidas Kaneriya v.ACIT (2025) 477 ITR 358 /172 taxmann.com 814 (Guj)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital gains-Information from investigation unit – Penny stock – Borrowed satisfaction- Fishing inquiry not permissible – Order of High Court quashing the notice is affirmed – SLP of revenue dismissed.[S. 10(38), 45, 148, Art. 136]

Dy. CIT v. Rakesh Ramanlal Shah (2025) 477 ITR 296 (SC) Editorial : Rakesh Ramanlal Shah. v. Dy. CIT 2024] 165 taxmann.com 364 / (2025) 477 ITR 289 (Guj)(HC)