S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Understatement of closing stock-Order of revision based on suspicion-Not valid-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S.260A]
CIT v. Gopal Sharma (2025) 482 ITR 226(Cal)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Understatement of closing stock-Order of revision based on suspicion-Not valid-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S.260A]
CIT v. Gopal Sharma (2025) 482 ITR 226(Cal)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Loans and advances-DDIT Investigation report-Shell companies-No discussion in the assessment order-Effect of insertion of Explanation to section 263 with effect from 1-6-2015-Revision order affirmed-Order of Tribunal set aside.[S. 68, 143(3), 260A, Explanation 2.]
PCIT v. Paramount Propbuild Pvt. Ltd [2024] 161 taxmann.com 85 / (2025) 482 ITR 61 (Delhi)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue Reassessment-Finding of Tribunal that reasons supplied to assessee were not same reasons recorded and found in assessment record and that order of reassessment was not valid-Finding that since reassessment order itself was not validly passed, revision thereof by Principal Commissioner was invalid-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 147, 148 Art. 136]
PCIT v. Bulbul Agrawal.(2025) 482 ITR 279 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Badal Prakash Jindal (HUF) (2023) 457 ITR 345 (Orissa)(HC)S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Affidavit-Copy of second paper book served on respondents-No denial of averment of assessee in petition that second paper book filed-Tribunal rejecting miscellaneous application without considering second paper book-Order of Tribunal quashed, remanded to Tribunal for consideration of second paper book.[S. 254(1), Art. 226]
Biryas Finance and Investments Pvt. Ltd v.ITO (2025) 482 ITR 927 (Bom)(HC)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Ex-parte order by the Tribunal-Principle of natural justice-Duty to grant assessee adequate opportunity to be heard-Order of Tribunal set aside.[S.260A]
Ayub (S/O. Abdul Khadar Tamatgar) v Jt. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 206 (Karn)(HC)S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Order remanded to Assessing Officer by Tribunal-Consequential order passed by Assessing Officer-On appeal Commissioner (Appeals) can consider matter on merits and is not bound by order of remand.[S. 254(1) 260A]
Vijay Sehgal v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 331 (P & H) (HC)S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-National Faceless Appeal Centre Delay in disposal of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-Directions issued to expedite adjudication of appeal within stipulated period. [S. 250, Art. 226]
Suparshva Swabs (I) v. NFAC (2025) 482 ITR 342 (Delhi)(HC)S. 245: Set-off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Adjustment without intimation not valid.[S. 220(6), 237, 244A Art. 226]
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 946 (Bom)(HC)S. 237 : Refunds-Interest on refund-Deputy Commissioner directed to refund with statutory interest if amount found to be refundable.[S.244A, Art. 226]
Mosaic India Pvt. Ltd. v.Dy. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 344 (Delhi)(HC)S.234E: Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Delay in filing statement of tax deducted at source Levy of late fee-Provision for imposition of late fee inserted only with effect from 1-6-2015 Late fee not importable before 1-6-2015-Delay in filing writ-Not ground for denying relief.[Art. 226]
Amaravati (represented by its managing partner Mohandas P. S) v.ITO (2025) 482 ITR 702 (Ker)(HC)