This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical approval-Multiple approval on other group cases -Non-application of mind -Order was quashed. [S. 132, 153A]

Navratan Management P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 100 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Undisclosed contract receipts -Estimation of profit at 8% upheld-Addition was deleted. [S. 44AD, 132(1)]

Sai Chandra Construction Co. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 493 (Delhi)(Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment of person other than searched person -Satisfaction note -Addition on basis of unacted seized agreement -Invalid approval under section 153D -Entire assessment quashed. [S. 69C, 132, 143(3), 153D]

Pushpanjali Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 201 (Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person -Search-A satisfaction note is required to be recorded under section 153C for each assessment year-A consolidated satisfaction note recorded for different assessment years would vitiate entire assessment proceedings [S. 132, 153A]

Anjana Construction v. ACIT (2025) 128 ITR 148 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment -“Reason to believe” -Reopening invalid where reasons recorded are factually incorrect and based on non-application of mind-Assessment was quashed. [S. 148, 151]

ITO v. Taj Land Developers and Promoters (P.) Ltd. (2025) 128 ITR 167 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 147: Reassessment -Addition cannot be made on issues unconnected with reasons recorded for reopening. Addition was deleted. [S. 148]

Rajesh Kumar Bansal v. ITO (2025) 128 ITR 123 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 147: Reassessment -Additional ground-Reassessment proceedings initiated solely on the basis of NMS, without any independent verification, tangible material, or proper satisfaction recorded by the AO, would not confer valid jurisdiction under section 147-Initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147 was void ab initio. [S. 115A, 139, 148, 194LD, 254(1)]

Argos Holdings Pte. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 128 ITR 582 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Validity of addition on new issue -Assessment reopened for escapement of salary income, but addition made on account of Recurring Deposit Investment -Addition was deleted. [S. 148]

Bhupesh Gupta v. ACIT (2025) 128 ITR 317 (Chd)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Revenue recognition -Derecognition of income in books -Addition sustainable. [S.28(i)]

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 128 ITR387 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel Reassessment -Limitation -Non-resident-Extended limitation under S. 153(4) available only where reference is made to Transfer Pricing Officer -Reassessment beyond prescribed period invalid. (S. 92CA, 144C, 148, 153(2), 153(4)

Syed Gulam Mohiuddin v. ITO (IT) (2025) 128 ITR 70 (Hyd)(Trib).