This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Charitable trust-Delay of 700 days in filing Form No. 10B-No mala fide intention-Assessee, a registered public charitable trust, could not be denied exemption merely on technical bar of limitation when substantive conditions were satisfied-Order rejecting condonation application quashed-Delay condoned and assessee permitted to upload Form No. 10B. [S. 11, 12, 119(2)(b), Art. 226, Form No. 10B]
Manav Seva Samiti v. PCCIT (2025) 480 ITR 457 /347 CTR 881 (Raj) (HC)
S. 80-IB(10) : Housing projects-Amendment by Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 1-4-2006-Joint venture development agreement and agreement for sale entered into on 23-11-2005, when s. 80AC was not on statute-For AY 2006-07, deduction u/s 80-IB(10) cannot be denied merely because no claim was made in return filed u/s 139(1)-However, for AYs 2007-08 onwards, in view of express bar in s. 80AC, no deduction allowable where assessee had not claimed deduction in return filed within due date-Plea that s. 80AC is only procedural/directory can be examined only in collateral proceedings under Art. 226 and not in appeal u/s 260A. [S. 80AC, 139(1), 260A, Art. 226]
Coromondel Cabeles Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT. (2025) 480 ITR 314 / 175 taxmann.com 587 (Mad)(HC) CIT v. Coromondel Cabeles Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 480 ITR 314 / 175 taxmann.com 587 (Mad)(HC)
S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Assessee failed to prove genuineness of loan from struck-off company by not producing erstwhile directors or cogent evidence-Addition sustained-Plea that S. 41(1) applies rejected, as no genuine liability ever came into existence. [S. 41(1)]
Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v.PCIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 1179 / (2025) 480 ITR 244 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial :SLP rejected, Valley Iron and Steel Company Ltd v. PCIT [2025] 181 taxmann.com 348 / 480 ITR 248 (SC)
S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Assessee failed to prove genuineness of loan from struck-off company by not producing erstwhile directors or cogent evidence-Addition sustained-Plea that S. 41(1) applies rejected, as no genuine liability ever came into existence-SLP dismissed. [S. 41(1), Art. 136]
Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v. PCIT (2025) 480 ITR 248/181 taxmann.com 348 (SC) Editorial : Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v. PCIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 1179 / (2025) 480 ITR 244 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Employees’ contribution to PF / ESI-Due date fell on national holiday-Payment made on next working day-Disallowance deleted-Deduction allowable. [S. 2(24)(x), 36(1)(va), 43B, 143(1)(a)]
Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 480 ITR 536 (Delhi)(HC)
S.37(1): Business expenditure-Interest on borrowed funds-Set-off of interest receipts against interest paid-Commencement of business-Interest income for all assessment years to be assessed under head “Business”-Order of Tribunal set aside and order of Commissioner (Appeals) restored. [S.28(1), 56, 57(iii)
Modi Business Centre Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2025) 480 ITR 471 (Bom)(HC)
S. 13 : Denial of exemption—Trust or institution—Investment restrictions—Salary paid to chairperson—Considered reasonable considering qualifications and services rendered—No violation of section 13(1)(c)—Trust entitled to exemption. [Ss. 11, 12, 12A, 13(1)(c), 13(2)(c), 40A(2)]
CIT v. IILM Foundation (2025) 480 ITR 1 / 174 taxmann.com 605 (Delhi) (HC).
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Rule of consistency-No change in facts-Exemption under section 10(23C)(iv) / sections 11 and 12 allowed in earlier years-Additional claim before CIT(A) maintainable-No violation of section 13(2)(b) / 13(3) in respect of residential accommodation given to trustees as employees-Tribunal order affirmed. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iv), 12, 13(2)(b), 13(3), 246A, 251(1)(a), 260A]
CIT v. Hamdard Laboratories (India) (2025) 480 ITR 498 (Delhi)(HC).
S. 9(1)(vii): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-E-invoicing services-Licence only to use platform/software and not transfer of technology or IPR-Training for use of software did not “make available” technical know-how-Under India-UK DTAA, treaty definition prevails over Act-Receipts not taxable as FTS. [S.144C(13), 147, 148, 260A, Art. 13(4)(c)]
Tungsten Automation England Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2025) 480 ITR 93 / 176 taxmann.com 497 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-“Make available” condition not satisfied-Services relating to customs brokerage support, destination services and training for developing global work culture did not involve transfer of specialised knowledge or skill-No income accrued or arose in India from business connection-Payment not taxable as fees for technical services under Act or Article 12 of India-USA DTAA. [S. 9(1)(i), Art. 12(5)]
CIT (IT) v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc. (2025) 480 ITR 30 / 171 taxmann.com 576 (Delhi)(HC).