This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147: Reassessment-Audit objection-Non-resident-Assessing Officer must apply independent mind-Audit objection is only “information” and not a command to reopen-Reassessment cannot be used to review a concluded scrutiny assessment-Change of opinion not permissible-In absence of failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, extended period of six years not available-Limitation restricted to four years from end of relevant assessment year-Notice issued beyond four years held barred by limitation-Notice under section 148A(b), order under section 148A(d) and notice under section 148 quashed. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, Art. 226]

Springer Healthcare Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 480 ITR 712 (Delhi)(HC).

S. 147 : Reassessment-Shell companies-Information from Investigation Wing that assessee raised share capital through paper/shell companies controlled by accommodation entry operator-Assessee failed to furnish crucial details sought by Assessing Officer-Information constituted tangible material having live link with formation of belief that income had escaped assessment-Reassessment notice held valid-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 68, 148, Art. 226]

Mukund System and Networking Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 480 ITR 566 /176 taxmann.com 923/347 CTR 210 / 255 DTR 113 (Gauhati)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Face less assessment-Notice under section 148 issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer held valid despite faceless assessment regime-Approval under section 151 by Joint Commissioner after 1-4-2021 invalid-In search cases, section 147 can be invoked where sections 153A/153C are inapplicable-Limitation for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 to be tested in light of TOLA and Ashish Agarwal / Rajeev Bansal-Matter remanded. [[S. 144B, 148, 149(1), proviso 3, 151, 153A, 153C, Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, s. 3(1), Art. 226]

Kanwaljeet Kaur v. ACIT (2025) 480 ITR 50 / 171 taxmann.com 174 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Business expenditure-Wages and salaries expenditure-Liability on account of retrospective revision in salaries of seconded employees crystallised during relevant assessment year-Full disclosure in accounts-Conditions of section 149(1)(b) not satisfied as escapement not represented in the form of an asset-Order under section 148A(d), notice under section 148 and reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 37(1), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 480 ITR 697 (Delhi)(HC

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Charitable Trust-Delay in filing Form 10B-No mala fide intention in Order rejecting assessee’s application quashed and set aside-Delay condoned.[S. 11, 12, 119(2)(b), Art.226, Form, 10B]

Khandelwal Vaishya Samaj Charitable Trust v. CIT (2025) 480 ITR 463/181 taxmann.com 710 (Raj)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Charitable trust-Delay of 700 days in filing Form No. 10B-No mala fide intention-Assessee, a registered public charitable trust, could not be denied exemption merely on technical bar of limitation when substantive conditions were satisfied-Order rejecting condonation application quashed-Delay condoned and assessee permitted to upload Form No. 10B. [S. 11, 12, 119(2)(b), Art. 226, Form No. 10B]

Manav Seva Samiti v. PCCIT (2025) 480 ITR 457 /347 CTR 881 (Raj) (HC)

S. 80-IB(10) : Housing projects-Amendment by Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 1-4-2006-Joint venture development agreement and agreement for sale entered into on 23-11-2005, when s. 80AC was not on statute-For AY 2006-07, deduction u/s 80-IB(10) cannot be denied merely because no claim was made in return filed u/s 139(1)-However, for AYs 2007-08 onwards, in view of express bar in s. 80AC, no deduction allowable where assessee had not claimed deduction in return filed within due date-Plea that s. 80AC is only procedural/directory can be examined only in collateral proceedings under Art. 226 and not in appeal u/s 260A. [S. 80AC, 139(1), 260A, Art. 226]

Coromondel Cabeles Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT. (2025) 480 ITR 314 / 175 taxmann.com 587 (Mad)(HC) CIT v. Coromondel Cabeles Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 480 ITR 314 / 175 taxmann.com 587 (Mad)(HC)

S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Assessee failed to prove genuineness of loan from struck-off company by not producing erstwhile directors or cogent evidence-Addition sustained-Plea that S. 41(1) applies rejected, as no genuine liability ever came into existence. [S. 41(1)]

Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v.PCIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 1179 / (2025) 480 ITR 244 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial :SLP rejected, Valley Iron and Steel Company Ltd v. PCIT [2025] 181 taxmann.com 348 / 480 ITR 248 (SC)

S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Assessee failed to prove genuineness of loan from struck-off company by not producing erstwhile directors or cogent evidence-Addition sustained-Plea that S. 41(1) applies rejected, as no genuine liability ever came into existence-SLP dismissed. [S. 41(1), Art. 136]

Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v. PCIT (2025) 480 ITR 248/181 taxmann.com 348 (SC) Editorial : Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v. PCIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 1179 / (2025) 480 ITR 244 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Employees’ contribution to PF / ESI-Due date fell on national holiday-Payment made on next working day-Disallowance deleted-Deduction allowable. [S. 2(24)(x), 36(1)(va), 43B, 143(1)(a)]

Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 480 ITR 536 (Delhi)(HC)