This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 44 : Insurance business-Expenditure relating to exempt income-Section 14A not applicable to insurance companies.-Reserve for unexpired premium-Double taxation to be avoided-Matter restored for verification.[S.14A, R.8D, R.6E]
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Business expenditure-Education cess and higher education cess-Part of tax-Deduction not allowable.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 40(a)(i); Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Business expenditure-Reinsurance premium paid to non-resident reinsurers-Not chargeable to tax in India-No liability to deduct tax at source. [S. 195]
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Personal expenses of directors-No evidence that expenditure belonged to assessee-Addition deleted.
Asst. CIT v. Shrigopal Rameshkumar Sales (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 1 (Nagpur)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Advertisement and sales promotion expenses-Real estate project undertaken on ownership basis-Revenue expenditure allowable.
Dy. CIT v. Piramal Estates (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 488 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Commission to motor vehicle dealers-Genuine business services established-Disallowance deleted-IBNR and IBNER provisions-Ascertained liabilities based on actuarial valuation-Deduction allowable.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Staff welfare expenses-Ad hoc disallowance without identifying non-business expenditure-Deletion justified.
SIEL Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (LTU) (2025) 123 ITR 599 / 173 taxmann.com 278 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Prior period expenses-Provision for gratuity already disallowed by assessee-Double disallowance not permissible-Matter restored.[S. 145]
Norben Tea and Exports Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 715 / 175 taxmann.com 237 (Kol.)(Trib.)
S. 36(1)(va) : Any sum received from employees-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Deposit beyond due date-Disallowance forms part of business income and not income from other sources-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Deduction not allowable under general provision of section 37(1).[S.2(24)(x), 37(1)]
Norben Tea and Exports Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 715 / 175 taxmann.com 237 (Kol.)(Trib.)
S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Business expenditure-Loans to sister concerns-Consistent view in earlier years-Disallowance deleted.[S. 37(1)]
SIEL Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (LTU) (2025) 123 ITR 599 / 173 taxmann.com 278 (Delhi)(Trib.)