This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Time limit-Minimum of seven days to respond-Order of single judge quashing the order was affirmed. [S. 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

PCCIT v. Komarla Yogendra Keertana (Smt) (2025) 307 Taxman 106 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice issued at old address-Notice was issued by jurisdictional assessing Officer and not Faceless Assessing Officer-Notice and order quashed and set aside. [S. 144B, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Vincent Commercial Company Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 320 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash deposited in bank-Failure to consider the reply-Principle of natural justice-Order of assessment was quashed and set aside. [S.144B, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Laxmanbhai Amarsingh Chavda v. AUD(2025) 307 Taxman 30 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained money-Allowed only four days to respond notice-Order passed under section 148A(d) as well as notice issued under section 148 were quashed and set-aside. [S. 69A, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Atul Mahavirprasad Paldecha v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 331 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained investments-Failure to consider the reply-Natural justice-Order and notice set aside-Matter remanded.[S. 69, 115BBE, 147,148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art.226]

Mehul Ravjibhai Surani v. AUID(2025) 307 Taxman 202 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-Failure to consider the reply-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order of the Assessing Officer is set aside-the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh de-nova order under section 148A(d) after considering the reply of assessee. [S. 68, 132, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Amarpadma Credits (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 305 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-Opportunity of hearing was given-Reassessment notice is affirmed-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 68, 143(1), 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

R. S. Alloys v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 70 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-Amounts of investments not fully disclosed in books of account-Search-Information from public domain-Fishing enquiry-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed. [S.69B, 148, Art. 226]

Dhirajlal Laljibhai Patel v. ACIT (2025) 307 Taxman 530 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Borrowed satisfaction-Underinvesting of export-Justice M.B. Shah Commission’s Report-SLP delay of 411 days-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S. 148, Art. 136]

ACIT v. Tungabhadra Minerals (P.) Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 303 (SC) Editorial: Balaji Mines and Minerals (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 163 taxmann.com 37 (Bom HC)

144B: Faceless Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Video conference was not provided-Order passed was quashed and set aside-Assessing Officer to pass a fresh de novo order in accordance with law. [Art. 226 ]

Siddharth Maneklal Patel v. NEAC (2025) 307 Taxman 327 (Guj.)(HC)