This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 56: Income from other sources-Income from other sources-Shares at premium-Cash flow method-Matter was to be restored to the file of CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.[S.56(2)(viib)]

ACIT, Central Circle. v. Sanghvi Beauty and Technologies (P.) Ltd. (2025) 215 ITD 588 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Interest-Highway project-Temporary parking of such funds in short-term deposits, interest earned thereon being inextricably linked with setting up of infrastructure facility was capital in nature and to be reduced from capital work-in-progress.[S. 4, 37(1)]

ACIT v. Chenani Nashri Tunnelway Ltd. (2025) 215 ITD 197 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 54B: Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Co-owner-Order of CIT(A), merely relying upon the decision of the co-owner without verifying distinguishing facts recorded by the Assessing Officer, was set aside and restored to him for decision afresh.[S. 45]

ITO v. Nitinbhai Kanubhai Patel. (2025) 215 ITD 565 /238 TTJ 908 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 54: Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Property is purchased in the name of spouse-Exemption cannot be denied.[S. 45]

Rajesh Narendrabhai Patel. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 282 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 54: Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Construction of house-Purchase of land with construction of house-matter was to be remitted back to the Assessing Officer for decision afresh.[S. 45, 54F]

Yogesh Mutha. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 87 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 48: Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Cost of improvement-Previous owner-Cost of acquisition-cost of construction and interiors-Additional evidence-Matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. [S.49(1)]

Vishnukumar Gokalchand Gupta. v. ACIT (2025) 215 ITD 453 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 48: Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Reference to valuation officer (FMV)-FMV of property as on 1-4-1981-Valuation report prepared by a Government-approved registered valuer-Matter was to be remanded back to file of Assessing Officer with a direction to refer valuation of property as on 1-4-1981 to DVO as per specific request of assessee, and thereafter, re-compute long-term capital gain-Cost of improvement expenses-Matter remanded for fresh examination-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Matter concerning correct sale consideration required de novo consideration and was to be restored to Assessing Officer.[S. 45, 50C, 55A, 131, 133(6), 154]

Harshadkumar Hargovandas Patel. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 374 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Capital asset-Sale of immovable property-Name of lender-Agency Transaction-Ownership established in the registered documents-Addition is affirmed. [S.2(14), 44AD]

Piyush M. Dobariya v. ITO (2025) [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1075 /127 ITR 246/234 TTJ 42 (Ahd)(Trib) Ajay Bharwad v.. ITO (2025) [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1075 /127 ITR 246/234 TTJ 42 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer-Joint development agreement (JDA-Developer was allowed to enter into property only for development work, and nothing therein shall be construed as parting with possession of the scheduled property by the owner-original title deed of land remained with the assessee-JDA was not an agreement to sell so as to invoke provisions of section 53A and consequently deemed transfer in terms of section 2(47)(v)-Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed. [S. 2(47)(v), 45, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S.53A]

ACIT Circle-5(1) v.Lakshmi Technosolutions (P) Ltd (2025) 215 ITD 333 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer-Year of taxability-Handed over possession-Oral agreement-Full consideration-Registered conveyance deed was executed later-Capital gains could not be taxed in the subsequent year when the deed was registered.[S. 2(47), 50C.]

Maimoon Fashion Accessories (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 241 (Mum) (Trib.)