This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disallowance of excess brought forward losses pursuant to MAP order-Revised computation filed-Time for filing revised return has expired-Paid additional tax along with interest-Penalty is deleted. [S. 143(2), 139(1), 139(5)]

DCIT v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries VST Diesel Engines (P) Ltd. (2024) 230 TTJ 298 / 240 DTR 26 / 38 NYPTTJ 717/ 163 taxmann.com 189 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bogus purchase-Addition made on estimate basis-Penalty is not leviable-Omission to strike off one of the twin charges in the notice-Not invalidate penalty proceedings. [S.69C, 274]

Dinesh Somatmal Dhokar v. ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 137 / 240 DTR 111 / 38 NYPTTJ 647 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 270A:Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Omission to file return-Sale of property TDS deducted-Penalty is deleted. [S. 139,194IA Form No 26AS]

Parulben Vijaykumar Patel v. ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 114 /239 DTR 33 / 38 NYPTTJ 646/ 163 taxmann.com 191 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Non-Resident-Trading in shares-CIT has not pointed out any reason for doubting the explanation-Revision order is set aside.[S. 143(3)]

Shama Ajay Patel v. CIT (2024) 230 TTJ 33 (UO) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Dividend-Mutual fund and Equity shares-Explanation 2 is not applicable-Revision is quashed. [S. 10(35), 115BBDA 143(3)]

Sampark Management Consultancy LLP v. PCIT (2024) 230 TTJ 735 / 241 DTR 84 / 38 NYPTTJ 365 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Unsigned assessment and non-service of order-Physical copy was signed-Up loaded unsigned copy-Revision is valid.[S. 143(3), 153C]

Ramasamy Sathyan v. ACIT (2024) 230 TTJ 889 / 240 DTR 377 /38 NYPTTJ 793 / 163 taxmann.com 519 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Territorial jurisdiction of CIT(A)-Appeal filed before non-jurisdictional CIT(A)-Order by the CIT(A) CIT(A), Noida is set aside and the matter is remanded to the CIT(A), Ghaziabad to adjudicate the appeal afresh in accordance with law. [S. 246A]

ITO v. Shalini Gupta (2024) 230 TTJ 403 / 239 DTR 123 / 38 NYPTTJ 657 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Salary-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) for verification. [S. 192, Form no 26AS]

Ajit Chandrashekar Dighe v. CIT (2024) 230 TTJ 766 / 238 DTR 30 / 38 NYPTTJ 412 / 167 taxmann.com 529 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 164 : Representative assessees-Charge of tax-Beneficiaries unknown-Trust-Maximum marginal rate-Temple-Income from charity received from devotees coming to the temple and interest on bank deposits-Beneficiaries are general public-Revenue Department website also advises that the tax rate of the trust is as applicable to the individual-The tax rate as specified in S. 164(2) will apply to the AOP/Individual and the initial exemption is also available [S.2(37), 12A,164(1) 164 (2)]

Shri Digambar Jain Mandir Trust v. ACIT (2024) 230 TTJ 1 (UO (Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Non-resident-The assessment was made as per the procedure laid down in S. 144C-No reference was made under S. 92CA(1)-Time-limit for completing the assessment under S. 147 was available upto 31st March, 2022-The final assessment order passed by the AO under s. 144 r/w s. 144C, dt. 12th Jan., 2023-Barred by limitation. [S.92CA, 144, 144C,147, 148 153(2)]

Syed Gulam Mohiuddin v. ITO (IT) (2024) 230 TTJ 956 / 38 NYPTTJ 716/ 163 taxmann.com 234 (Hyd)(Trib)