This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Incorrect facts-Reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Kamlesh Kumari v. UOI (2025) 483 ITR 179(All)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Notice-Suspicion-Notice to verify details that income has escaped assessment is not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 353 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection is quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Nathalal Ambalal and Sons v. ITO [2023] 156 taxmann.com 31 / (2025) 483 ITR 701 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Audit objection-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 655 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts –Sham transaction-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed-Sanction-Non-application of mind.[S.50C, 148,151 Art. 226]

Shourya Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 730 / (2025) 483 ITR 528 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

E. Infochips Pvt. Ltd. (earlier E. Infochips Ltd.) v. ACIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 468 / (2025) 483 ITR 229 (Guj)(HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Search and seizure-Assessment in Rejection of books of account-Estimation of gross profit-Restriction of gross profit to two per cent. from four per cent. by Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed by Tribunal-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 132, 153A,260A]

PCIT v. B.B. Tradelink Agro Pvt. Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 232 (Guj)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International transactions-Draft assessment order must be forwarded to assessee-Failure to pass draft assessment order would render assessment order as null and void. [S.92C, 92CA, Art. 226.]

CWT India Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT [2023] 155 taxmann.com 450 / (2025) 483 ITR 194 (Bom)(HC)

S. 144B: Faceless Assessment Video conference-Adequate opportunity of hearing should be given to assessee.[S. 147, Art. 226]

Studio Virtues v.NFAC (2025) 483 ITR 636 (Guj)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Principle of natural justice-All correspondence sent to assessee’s old address-Intimation received by assessee at new address after three years-Direction to provide opportunity of hearing.[Art. 226]

Vidya Ravichandran v. ITO (2025) 483 ITR 719 (Mad)(HC)