This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 45: Capital gains-Agreement of sale-Registration-Assessee handed over the land to the buyer and also received the sale consideration in asst. yr. 2008-09-Provisions of IT Act apply on the basis of real income and not based on notional income-No provision for increasing sale consideration by notional interest.[S. 48]

Deepak Kothari v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 241 / 177 taxmann.com 219 (Delhi) Trib)

S. 44BB: Mineral oils-Computation-Providing its vessels for transportation to entities engaged in the exploitation/exploration of seabed or subsoil-Section 44BB was not applicable-AO is directed to compute the income of the assessee in terms of art. 21(4) of the India-Norway DTAA-DTAA-India-Norway [S.90, Art, 21]

Sanco Holding AS v. DCIT (IT) (2025) 237 TTJ 936 / 178 taxmann.com 673 (Dehradun) (Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment-Payment of TDS inadvertently misreported under cl. 26(B)(b) of From No. 3CD-the matter is restored to the jurisdictional AO with a direction to verify the correctness of the assessee’s claim and re-adjudicate the allowability of payments under S 43B in accordance with law.

Darshit Gunantbhai Shah v. ITO (2025) 237 TTJ 359 / 177 taxmann.com 36 ((Ahd)(Trib)

S. 41(1): Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Creditors outstanding for a long time-The amount due to the creditors is not chargeable to tax.

Kumar Urban Development (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 881 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 40A(3): Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Alleged non-genuine purchases-lack of proper enquiry-Matter is restored to the AO with a direction to conduct a de novo assessment on this issue after carrying out proper and comprehensive enquiry regarding various aspects.[S.133(6)]

Shital Vipulkumar Dholakia v. ITO (2025) 237 TTJ 1045 (Ahd)(Trib)

S.40(a)(iib): Amounts not deductible-Business expenditure-Collection and payment of privilege fee, special privilege fee, etc. to the State Government-Disallowance was deleted. [S.37(1), A.P. (Regulation of Trade in Indian made Foreign Liquor, Foreign Liquor) Act, 1993, S 4]

Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 716 / 175 taxmann.com 567 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Fees for technical services-Marketing support services-Payment cannot be taxed in view of the application of provisions of s. 90(2)-Payment made to ADP cannot be disallowed under S. 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS under S. 195-DTAA-India-Australia [S. 9(1)(vii), 90(2), 195 Art. 7, 12(3)]

ADP (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 1080/ 177 taxmann.com 708 (Hyd)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Insurance premium paid on the insurance policy of a partner-Loan was granted with the condition of obtaining an insurance policy of one partner-Allowable as business expenditure.

Pankaj Enterprises v. Dy. CIT (2025) 237 TTJ 497 (Mum) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Penalty, fine, etc.-Payment made to intermediaries/ aggregators towards outsourcing of policy servicing activities-The payment made to the aggregators is allowable as a deduction.

HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 105 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 35: Expenditure on scientific research-Non-submission of Form No. 3CL-Weighted deduction not allowable-Allowable as a deduction under S 35(1)(i) and 35(1)(iv). [S. 35(1), 35(1)(iv), 35(2AB)]

Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 268 / 177 taxmann.com 118 (Mum) (Trib)