S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-Notice for levy of penalty must be issued before expiry of limitation-Notice was barred by limitation. [S.274, 275(1)(c)]
PCIT v. Thapar Homes Ltd.(2025) 483 ITR 248 (Delhi)(HC)S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-Notice for levy of penalty must be issued before expiry of limitation-Notice was barred by limitation. [S.274, 275(1)(c)]
PCIT v. Thapar Homes Ltd.(2025) 483 ITR 248 (Delhi)(HC)S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-Concealment-Penalty should be levied within a reasonable time-Order levying penalty eleven years after passing of assessment order and fourteen years after return-Held to be not valid. [S. 271(1)(c), 275(1)(c)] was filed Not valid-Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 275(1)(c).
PCIT v. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 109 (Delhi)(HC)S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-First appellate order was received in the financial year 2006-2007-The penalty should have been imposed within March 31, 2008 as per the proviso, especially when the order was one passed after June 1, 2003-The orders were passed on March 31, 2009 much after the limitation period-Not valid.[S.260A, 275(1)(a)]
Mahesh Kr. Agarwal @ Mahesh Agarwal v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 57 (Pat)(HC)S. 271E: Penalty-Repayment of loan or deposit-Book entries discharge of liabilities-Repayment of loan in cash-No evidence that loan was repaid in cash-Penalty not imposable. [S. 269SS, 269T]
Anamallais Bus Transports Pvt. Ltd v. PCIT [2024] 158 taxmann.com 245 / (2025) 483 ITR 659 (Mad)(HC)S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Acceptance of loan in cash in excess of specified limit-No satisfaction recorded-Order of Tribunal deleting the penalty is affirmed. [S.260A, 269SS]
PCIT v. Parivar Television Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 483 ITR 391/ 180 taxmann.com 109 ((Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, PCIT v. Parivar Television Pvt. Ltd ([2025] 481 ITR 14/2026) 308 Taxman 186 (SC)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Difference between assessed income and returned income-Survey-Presumption not rebutted-Levy of penalty valid. [S. 133A, 260A]
Kawaljit Enterprises v. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 681 (Telengna)(HC)S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Mistake in return-No intention to conceal income or furnishing inaccurate particulars thereof-Order of Tribunal deleting the penalty affirmed. [S. 139]
PCIT v. Pinstorm Technologies Pvt. Ltd [2024] 158 taxmann.com 511 / (2025) 483 ITR 591 (Bom)(HC)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bona fide belief-Charitable trust-Registration-Deletion of penalty by the Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 12A, 260A]
CIT v. Punjab Heritage and Tourism Promotion Board (2025) 483 ITR 581 (P & H) (HC)S. 264 :Commissioner-Revision of other orders –Rejection of application for rectification on ground that error sought to be rectified was not manifest-Commissioner had no power to revise order under section 264.[S. 143(1), 154]
Hotel Raj Laxmi v.PCIT (2025) 483 ITR 258 (Patna)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Alleged bogus purchases-Assessment had been passed after due enquiry-Revision of order not valid.[S. 143(3), 260A]
PCIT v. Ramchandra Dahyabhai Narrow Fab Pvt. Ltd.(2025) 483 ITR 722 (Guj)(HC)