This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 48: Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Cost of improvement-Previous owner-Cost of acquisition-cost of construction and interiors-Additional evidence-Matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. [S.49(1)]

Vishnukumar Gokalchand Gupta. v. ACIT (2025) 215 ITD 453 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 48: Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Reference to valuation officer (FMV)-FMV of property as on 1-4-1981-Valuation report prepared by a Government-approved registered valuer-Matter was to be remanded back to file of Assessing Officer with a direction to refer valuation of property as on 1-4-1981 to DVO as per specific request of assessee, and thereafter, re-compute long-term capital gain-Cost of improvement expenses-Matter remanded for fresh examination-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Matter concerning correct sale consideration required de novo consideration and was to be restored to Assessing Officer.[S. 45, 50C, 55A, 131, 133(6), 154]

Harshadkumar Hargovandas Patel. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 374 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Capital asset-Sale of immovable property-Name of lender-Agency Transaction-Ownership established in the registered documents-Addition is affirmed. [S.2(14), 44AD]

Piyush M. Dobariya v. ITO (2025) [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1075 /127 ITR 246/234 TTJ 42 (Ahd)(Trib) Ajay Bharwad v.. ITO (2025) [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1075 /127 ITR 246/234 TTJ 42 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer-Joint development agreement (JDA-Developer was allowed to enter into property only for development work, and nothing therein shall be construed as parting with possession of the scheduled property by the owner-original title deed of land remained with the assessee-JDA was not an agreement to sell so as to invoke provisions of section 53A and consequently deemed transfer in terms of section 2(47)(v)-Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed. [S. 2(47)(v), 45, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S.53A]

ACIT Circle-5(1) v.Lakshmi Technosolutions (P) Ltd (2025) 215 ITD 333 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer-Year of taxability-Handed over possession-Oral agreement-Full consideration-Registered conveyance deed was executed later-Capital gains could not be taxed in the subsequent year when the deed was registered.[S. 2(47), 50C.]

Maimoon Fashion Accessories (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 241 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Sale of property-Commercial building-Capital asset-Intention to let out-Constructed and sold over six years-Assessable as capital gains and not as business income-Exemption under section 54EC was allowable.[. S.2(14), 28(i), 54EC]

Basavaraju Shivakumar Holavanahalli. v. ACIT (2025) 215 ITD 316 (Bang) (Trib.)

S.43CA: Transfer of assets-other than capital assets-Full value of consideration-stock in trade-Agreement value-Stamp valuation Difference between SDV and agreement value was less than 5 per cent-Addition is deleted-Change of opinion-Reopening is not justified.[S.50C 147, 148]

Om Shriniwas Developers v. ITO [2025] 177 taxmann.com 610 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib.)

S.43CA: Transfer of assets-other than capital assets-Full value of consideration-stock in trade-Agreement value-Stamp valuation-Tolerance limit of 10 per cent introduced by Finance Act, 2020 to section 43CA is curative in nature and, therefore, applicable retrospectively.[S.50C]

DCIT v. Amardeep Constructions. (2025) 215 ITD 322 (Mum) (Trib.)

S.43CA: Transfer of assets-other than capital assets-Full value of consideration-stock in trade-Agreement value-Stamp valuation-Allowing 10 per cent tolerance band is curative and applies retrospectively-No addition was warranted in case of assessee, where difference between DVO value and sale consideration was within permissible limit for assessment year 2018-19.[S.50C]

DCIT v. Gaurav Investments. (2025) 215 ITD 124 (Mum) (Trib.)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment-Liabilities disallowed in earlier year-Paid during year-Allowable on furnishing payment evidence, while addition for balance amount without supporting evidence was to be sustained.

Magnaquest Technologies Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 215 ITD 146 (Hyd) (Trib.)