This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Undisclosed investments-Opportunity of hearing-One day’s time to respond to show-cause notice-Violation of natural justice-Matter remanded.[S. 69B, 144B, Art. 226]

Vibgyor Vinimay (P.) Ltd. v. NFAC [2025] 175 taxmann.com 643 (Bom) (HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Non-existent entity-Merger-Notice and assessment in the name of transferor company-Invalid-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S.147.260A, 292B]

CIT-LTU v. Shell India Markets (P.) Ltd. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 349 (Bom) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT-LTU v. Shell India Markets (P.) Ltd (2026] 310 Taxman 1 (SC)

S. 143(1): Assessment-Intimation-Writ petition challenging huge demand-Where intimation was appealable under section 246A and no mandatory pre-deposit was required for filing an appeal, the High Court could not interfere in writ jurisdiction merely because a huge demand was raised. [S. 246A, Art. 226]

Fiat India Automobiles Ltd. v. DDIT [2025] 170 taxmann.com 789 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 139: Return of income-Invalid return-Non-filing of audit report-Order of CPC-Writ petition-Alternate remedy-Directed to avail the alternate remedy under section 264. [S. 44AB, 139((9),143(1), 264,Art. 226]

TPL-HGIEPL Joint Venture v. UOI [2025] 173 taxmann.com 540 (Bom) (HC)

S. 132B: Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Seized assets-Police Authorities-Specified Bank Notes-Deposit with RBI-Serial numbers available-Deposit permitted. [S 131, 132; Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017, S. 5(a); Rules, r. 2(a), Art. 226]

Ramesh Bapurao Potdar v. UOI [2025] 173 taxmann.com 227 (Bom) (HC).

S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Release of seized jewellery-Strictures-Department and bank disputing responsibility for missing jewellery-Both authorities directed to investigate and take immediate action.[S. 119, 132, Art. 226]

Hiralal H. Malu v. DDI (Inv.) [2025] 171 taxmann.com 260 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 132: Search and seizure-Satisfaction note-Revenue did not have the satisfaction note, which formed the basis for issuance and authorisation of the search warrant under section 132(1)-Order was quashed.[S. 132(1), Art. 226]

CIT v. ITAT [2025] 179 taxmann.com 409 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT v. Vijay Goel (2025) 307 Taxman 445 (SC)

S. 132: Search and seizure-Seizure of gold and jewellery claimed to be stock-in-trade-Plea challenging legality of seizure not raised before authorities-Opportunity granted to seek release. [S. 131(1A), 132(1)(iii),Art. 226]

H. K. Jewels (P.) Ltd. v. ADI (Inv.) [2025] 172 taxmann.com 616 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 127: Power to transfer cases-Agreement between officers of equal rank-Condition precedent-Compliance with statutory requirements-Transfer valid. [S.127(2), Art. 226]

Protractive in and out Advertising (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT [2025] 173 taxmann.com 104 (Bom) (HC).

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay in filing revised return-Order refusing to condone the delay was set aside, and the delay in filing the revised return was condoned.[S. 11, 139, Art. 226]

Bharat Education Society v. ITO [2025] 177 taxmann.com 710 (Bom)(HC)