This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Time limit-Final assessment order to be passed within one month from the end of the month in which the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel are received-Order passed about five months late-Timeline is mandatory-Order, computation sheet and demand notice quashed. [S. 143, 144B, 156]

Zynga Game Network India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2026) 309 Taxman 322 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Failure to provide personal hearing through video conferencing against proposed variation and video conference was duly scheduled-Assessing Officer passed final order before such hearing-Order violated section 144B(6)(vii) and principles of natural justice-Order was quashed and set aside . [S. 143(3),144B(6)(vii), Art . 226]

Sanjiv Manoharlal Sethi v .Dy .CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 311 (Bom)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Non-existing entity-Order passed in the name of non-existing amalgamated entities despite revenue’s knowledge-Application for additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC allowed-SLP dismissed. [S. 143, 260A, CPC Order XLI Rule 27, Art. 136]

Dy. CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. [2026] 309 Taxman 501/488 ITR 624 (SC). Editorial: Reliance Industries Ltd. v. P. L. Roongta [2025] 171 taxmann.com 467 /479 ITR 770 (Bom)(HC)

S. 139: Return of income-Condonation of delay-Return uploaded eight minutes late owing to portal issues-Carry forward of business loss of about Rs. 21.33 crores denied under section 80-Minimal delay condoned to prevent grave hardship. [S. 44AB, 80, 119(2)(b), 139(1), Art. 226]

Sikkim Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CBDT (2026) 309 Taxman 148 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 127: Power to transfer cases-Income-tax authorities-A transfer under section 127 remains valid notwithstanding the quashing of the search under section 132. [S.132, 133A, Art. 136]

Pawan Kaur Goel v. Pr. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 248 /488 ITR 654 (SC) Editorial: Pawan Kumar Goel v. PCIT [2026] 182 taxmann.com 507 (P & H) (HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Property held for charitable purposes-Exemption denied due to 50 days delay in filing audit report Form 10B-Delay was condoned and directed to grant the exemption. [S. 11, 12A, 119(2)(b), Form No.10B, Art. 226]

Dawat E Islami Hind v. CIT (E) [2026] 309 Taxman 531 (Bom)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Co-operative society-Delay in filing return-Genuine hardship-Shortage of departmental auditors empanelled under Odisha Cooperative Societies Act-Genuine hardship-Principal Chief Commissioner should have considered the application under Section 119(2)(b) appropriately by allowing the assessee to avail the benefit of Section 80P.[S.80P, 119(2)(b),139(1), Odisha Cooperative Societies Act, 1962 (OCS Act), S 62, Art . 226]

Reserve Bank Employees Co-op. Credit Society Ltd v. PCCIT [2026] 309 Taxman 279 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return of income-Condonation of delay-For condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b), mere residence abroad, senior citizen status, or ignorance of tax laws does not constitute sufficient cause or genuine hardship; rejection of the condonation application is justified. [S. 119(2)(b), 139, Art. 226]

Manjit Singh Dhaliwal v. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 129 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 115BAA: Tax on income of certain domestic companies-Concessional tax regime-Failure to file Form No. 10-IC within the due date due to COVID and portal issues-First year of regulation-Genuine hardship arose from denial of benefit, resulting in substantial tax demand; delay in filing Form 10-IC was condoned. [S. 119, Form No 10-IC, R. 21AE]

Rama Industries Ltd v. Pr.CIT [2026] 309 Taxman 221 (Bom)(HC)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Aggregation approach-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.260A]

PCIT v. Borwarner Emissions Systems India P.Ltd.[2026] 309 Taxman 269 (Delhi)(HC)