S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Incorrect facts-Reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Kamlesh Kumari v. UOI (2025) 483 ITR 179(All)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Incorrect facts-Reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Kamlesh Kumari v. UOI (2025) 483 ITR 179(All)(HC)S. 147: Reassessment-Notice-Suspicion-Notice to verify details that income has escaped assessment is not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 353 (Bom)(HC)S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection is quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Nathalal Ambalal and Sons v. ITO [2023] 156 taxmann.com 31 / (2025) 483 ITR 701 (Guj)(HC)S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Audit objection-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 655 (Guj)(HC)S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts –Sham transaction-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed-Sanction-Non-application of mind.[S.50C, 148,151 Art. 226]
Shourya Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 730 / (2025) 483 ITR 528 (Delhi)(HC)S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]
E. Infochips Pvt. Ltd. (earlier E. Infochips Ltd.) v. ACIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 468 / (2025) 483 ITR 229 (Guj)(HC)S. 145 : Method of accounting-Search and seizure-Assessment in Rejection of books of account-Estimation of gross profit-Restriction of gross profit to two per cent. from four per cent. by Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed by Tribunal-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 132, 153A,260A]
PCIT v. B.B. Tradelink Agro Pvt. Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 232 (Guj)(HC)S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International transactions-Draft assessment order must be forwarded to assessee-Failure to pass draft assessment order would render assessment order as null and void. [S.92C, 92CA, Art. 226.]
CWT India Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT [2023] 155 taxmann.com 450 / (2025) 483 ITR 194 (Bom)(HC)S. 144B: Faceless Assessment Video conference-Adequate opportunity of hearing should be given to assessee.[S. 147, Art. 226]
Studio Virtues v.NFAC (2025) 483 ITR 636 (Guj)(HC)S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Principle of natural justice-All correspondence sent to assessee’s old address-Intimation received by assessee at new address after three years-Direction to provide opportunity of hearing.[Art. 226]
Vidya Ravichandran v. ITO (2025) 483 ITR 719 (Mad)(HC)