This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S.32: Depreciation-Intangible asset-Slump sale-Acquisition of manufacturing, supply and maintenance contracts-Goodwill-AO is directed to treat the excess of consideration paid over and above the fair market value of the assets and liabilities as goodwill and allow depreciation-Depreciation-Unabsorbed-Carry forward and set off-set off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to asst. yr. 2008-09 cannot be denied on the basis that for that assessment year the assessee filed its return of income under S. 139(4) [S.2(42C),32(1)(ii), 32(2), 50B, 72, 80,139(4)]
Thermo Fisher Scientific India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 236 TTJ 865 / 176 taxmann.com 501 (Mum) Trib)
S. 32: Depreciation-Intangible asset-Goodwill arising pursuant to amalgamation-The excess consideration paid is bona fide, attributable to commercial intent, and not a colourable device-The goodwill constitutes a depreciable asset]-Depreciation is allowable. [S.2(IB), 32(1)(ii)43(1), 43(6), 49(1)(iii)(e)]
ACIT v. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2025) 236 TTJ 550/ 174 taxmann.com 867 (Ahd)(Trib)
S. 28(iv): Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Converted into money or not-Shares received on a loan basis-Neither the existence of any written agreement itself is determinative of the character of the transaction per se, nor absence thereof prevents the AO from assessing the circumstantial and surrounding circumstances to arrive at a lawful conclusion-No benefit can be said to have accrued to the assessee-The liability towards repayment of such loan transactions continues to exist during the year-Tere is no remission or cessation of any liability towards lender-Book profit-Books of account not rejected]-Addition deleted]-Addition is not sustainable. [S. 41(1), 115JB, 131, 133A]
Narayan Securities Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 236 TTJ 339/ 174 taxmann.com 217 (Delhi) Trib)
S. 28(iv): Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Converted into money or not-Share application money-Shares issued after some years-Capital receipt]-Not taxable as business income.[S.4]
ACIT v. Dewanchand Ramsaran Industries (P) LTD. (2025) 236 TTJ 205 / 173 taxmann.com 743 (Mum)(Trib)
S. 13A: Political parties-Income of political party-Non-filing of return within the due date-Not entitled to exemption-Claim for netting is also not allowed. [S.139(1), 139(4B]
Indian National Congress All India Congress Committee v. DCIT (2025) 236 TTJ 633 / 176 taxmann.com 688 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Time limit-Existing society-Rejection of the application on the ground that the assessee was required to apply in Form No. 10AB within six months from the start of its activities is not justified-Failure to file proper replies-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(E) to decide in accordance with law. [S.80G(5), Form No.10AB]
Katni Blood Donor & Welfare Society v. CIT (E) (2025) 236 TTJ 267 (Jabalpur)(Trib)
S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Accumulation of income-Belated exercise of option during assessment proceedings]-The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim of deemed application of income. [S. 11(1), 12A,12B 143(3)]
Shri Mahavir Gopalan Charitable Trust v. ITO (E) (2025) 236 TTJ 363 (Ahd) Trib)
S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Omission to show application of funds in the IT return-Denial of exemption was not justified.[S. 12, 139]
Bright Land College v. ITO (E) (2025) 236 TTJ 125 / 174 taxmann.com 743 (Lucknow)(Trib)
S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Change of name]-Not applied for fresh registration-Assessed under the normal provisions of the Act]-All permissible deductions, including expenditure incurred out of said income, allowable as deduction-Matter restored to the file of the Assessing Officer. [S. 12A, 37 (1)]
The Zoos & Parks Authority Of Telangana v. Dy.CIT (E) (2025) 236 TTJ 117/ 174 taxmann.com 1136 (Hyd) (Trib)
S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Filing of return-total income of the assessee without giving effect to the provisions of s. 10(23C)(iiiad)] exceeded the maximum amount not chargeable to income-tax-Not required to file return of income either under section 139(1) or under section 139(4C)]-Return filed in response to section 148 cannot be treated as invalid]-Disallowance of claim was not justified. [S. 10(23C)(iiiad), 139(1) 139(4C), 148]
Institute Management Committee ITI Jhalawar v. ITO (2025) 236 TTJ 420 / 174 taxmann.com 1071 (Jaipur)(Trib)