This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Renovation of hotel-Repairs-Expenditure on pressurisation of lift silafts-fees paid to interior decorator-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Additional ground-Matter remanded to the Assessing officer-Entries in the books of account cannot be the basis for determining whether the expenditure are capital or revenue. [S. 30(a)(ii)), 145]

Asian Hotels Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 470 ITR 1 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-The advancement of objects of general public utility-Entitle to exemption.[S. 2(15), 12, 260A]

CIT v. (E) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (2024)470 ITR 164 (Guj) (HC)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Business connection-Subscription fee-Access to data base pertaining to legal and law related information-Business profits-No permanent establishment in India-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-USA. [S.9(1)(1), Art. 5, 7, 12]

CIT (IT) v. Relx Inc (2024)470 ITR 611 / 160 taxmann.com 109 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: Order in Relx Inc v. ACIT (2023) 103 ITR 54(SN) (Delhi)(Trib) is affirmed.

S. 56 : Income from other sources -Transactions between partners and firm-Will – Family settlement –Brothers and sisters -Changes in the profit sharing ratio- Colourable device – Transfer – Capital contribution- The provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) of the Act is not applicable – Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed . [ S. 2(31)(iv), 2(47), 14, 56(2)(viia), R. 11UA ]

ITO v. SDN Company (Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org .

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration – The object of the company is to promote Indian heritage art such as Indian Classical music, organize regular concerts and performances by renowned and emerging Indian etc -Renewal of registration cannot be denied on the ground that the objects of the trust may contain clauses, which may enable a charitable trust or institution to apply its income for activities carried outside India – Denial of registration and 80G exemption is set aside – On merit the matter is remanded to the CIT( E) to examine the genuineness of the activists. [ S. 2(15) , 11(1)( c), 12A, 12AB , 80G , Companies Act, 2013 , S.8 ]

Dedhia Music Foundation v. CIT( E) (Mum)( Trib ) www.itatonline.org .

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Sale of property-Distress sale constitute reasonable cause-Cash deposited in the bank-Levy of penalty is deleted.[S. 269SS, 273B]

Vijapurapu Sudha Rao L/R Of Vijapurapu Suryanarayana Rao (Smt.) v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 669 /(2024) 228 TTJ 131 / 234 DTR 276 / 38 NYPTTJ 47 (Vishakha) (Trib)

S. 271B : Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Affidavit-Obtained tax audit report on 28th Sept., 2011-Inadvertently filled the column regarding details of audit under S. 44AB wrongly as No-Bonafide mistake-Penalty is deleted. [S.44AB]

Paras Mal Sethia Through Lr Smt. Kamla Devi Sethia v. ITO (2024) 159 taxmann.com 1239 /228 TTJ 17(UO) (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Search-Additional income declared- No incriminating material is found-271(1)(c),Explanation 5 is not applicable-Penalty is deleted. [S. 132,132A, 153A]

Chander Mohan Arora v. DCIT (2024) 228 TTJ 126 / 234 DTR 290 / 38 NYPTTJ 104 (Amritsar)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of proper enquiry-TPO-Transfer pricing-Instruction No. 3 of 2016, dt. 10th March, 2016-Both parties paying tax at similar rate-Failure to follow the directions of the Circular-Order is erroneous.[S.40A(2)(b)]

Richa & Co. v. JCIT (2023) 37 NYPTTJ 1728 / (2024) 228 TTJ 1010 / 236 DTR 178 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of proper enquiry-Lease rent-Detailed enquiry was made in the course of assessment proceedings-All details were furnished-Order is not erroneous-Revision is quashed-Repairs and maintenance-freight forwarding, miscellaneous expenses and sales promotion-Revision is justified as regards to freight forward expenses. [S. 40A(2)(b), 142(1), 194I]

Nipro India Corporation (P) Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 37 NYPTTJ 648/ (2024) 228 TTJ 733 / 236 DTR 201 (Pune)(Trib)