S. 69: Unexplained investments- Search assessment-Sale of shares-Opening stock ignored by Assessing Officer-Addition for unexplained investment deleted.- Addition based on material collected behind assessee’s back-No opportunity of rebuttal-Addition deleted- Loose papers-No corroborative evidence of investment-Addition deleted- Bank deposits recorded in books-Entire deposits cannot be treated as unexplained income- CIT(A) was not justified in relying on Joint Parliamentary Committee on scam, when the assessee explaining specific transactions of deposit-addition was deleted- Bonds registered in Assessee’s name by order of Special Court. Assessing Officer’s computation of accrued interest as assessee’s income was sustained.- Surrender of Income-Addition was directed to be deleted even if reassessed income lower than sum surrendered. ( [S. 4, 68, 69A, 132,132(4), 139, Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities Act, 1992]
Growmore Research and Assets Management Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 125 ITR 44 (Mum.)(Trib.)