This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Foreign exchange gain arising from trade receivables of international transactions constitutes operating income for computing PLI-Functionally dissimilar companies cannot be selected as comparables for benchmarking ITES transactions. [S.92BA]
Vodafone Global Services P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 323 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Overseas AE, being the least complex entity, can be selected as the tested party where the assessee substantiates its functional profile and comparability-Matter remanded for fresh examination. [S.92A, 92B]
Unilog Content Solutions P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 477 (Bang)(Trib.)
S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Ad-hoc determination of ALP of intra-group royalty payments at Nil without applying any prescribed method or comparable transaction is unsustainable-Where the assessee benchmarked the transaction under CUP and substantiated receipt of services, TP adjustment is liable to be deleted. [S.92CA]
Unilever India Exports Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 455 (Mum)(Trib.)
S. 90: Double taxation relief-Tax on excess interest under Article 11 cannot exceed the treaty rate of 10%-Surcharge and education cess not leviable separately-DTAA-India-Cyprus. [Art. 11]
Fairfield Developments Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (2025) 130 ITR 211 (Hyd.)(Trib.)
S. 80JJA: Biodegradable waste-Collecting and processing-Allocation of expenses-Consistency of practice-Order of CIT(A) affirmed.
Anil Ltd. (formerly Anil Products Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 351 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 80P: Co-operative societies-Deduction under section 80P cannot be denied merely because the assessee claimed deduction under the wrong provision. [S. 80A(5), 80P(2)(a)(i), 80P(2)(c), 154]
Habrol Co-operative Agricultural Service Society Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 130 ITR 425 (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Search assessment-Entire unaccounted business receipts cannot be taxed where corresponding unaccounted business expenditure is evidenced-Only profit element embedded in such receipts is taxable by applying a reasonable net profit rate and telescoping of expenditure is permissible. [S. 145, 153A]
Sankalp Recreation P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 517 (Ahd)(Trib.)
S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search assessment-Unaccounted receipts-Estimation of profit-Telescoping-Seized cash-PF/ESI contributions-Addition was deleted..[S. 69C 132, 145, 153A, General Clauses Act]
Sankalp Recreation Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 130 ITR 517 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 69A: Unexplained money-Addition cannot be made on the entire value of alleged unaccounted sales-Only the profit element embedded in such sales is taxable, even where the existence of clandestine sales is established through seized documents and corroborative third-party statements-Estimation of profit at 6% by the CIT(A) was held to be reasonable. [S. 69A, 147]
Shah Foils Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 130 ITR 198 (Ahd(Trib.)
S. 68: Cash credits-Once the assessee establishes the identity and creditworthiness of the shareholders and the genuineness of the transaction, the burden shifts to the Assessing Officer. Addition was deleted.
ITO v. Express Tradelink (P.) Ltd. (2025) 130 ITR 282 (Kol.)(Trib.) Editorial: Affirmed in PCIT v. Express Tradelink (P.) Ltd. [2026] 309 Taxman 369 (Cal.)(HC).