This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 147: Reassessment-Reassessment notices issued merely on the basis of third-party search information, without any material linking the assessee to the alleged escaped income and with reasons recorded mechanically without independent application of mind, are invalid and quashed; SLP dismissed. [S. 69, 132, 148 Art. 136]
ITO v. Amitkumar Chandulal Rajani (2026) 309 Taxman 332 (SC) Editorial: Amitkumar Chandulal Rajani v. ITO [2025] 173 taxmann.com 302 (Guj)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Audit objection-CSR expenditure-Notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed by the High Court-SLP of the revenue dismissed. [S. 37(1) 148, Art, 136]
ACIT v. Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. (2026) 309 Taxman 1 (SC) Editorial: Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd v .ACIT (2023) 292 Taxman 475/ 454 ITR 734 (Guj)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Lease rent-Unrealised gain-Depreciation-Absence of fresh tangible material-Reopening cannot be initiated on repetitive lease rent transactions accepted in past scrutiny assessments, unearned/unrealized foreign exchange hedging variations, or by applying prospective amendments on goodwill depreciation retroactively-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 32(1), 37(1),43(6) (c), 148, Art. 136]
Dy. CIT v. GTPL Hathway Ltd.[2026] 309 Taxman 244/488 ITR 636 (SC) Editorial: GTPL Hathway Ltd. v. Dy.CIT [2025] 171 taxmann.com 616 (Guj)(HC).
S. 145: Method of accounting-Income-Accrual-Real income theory-Interest accrued on NPA loans is taxable where the assessee’s own conduct, such as extending further credit to the same borrowers, shows a realistic prospect of recovery; RBI Prudential Norms do not govern taxability under the Income-tax Act. [S. 4, 5]
Pact Securities & Financial Services Ltd. v. Dy CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 374 (Telangana)(HC)
S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Time limit-Final assessment order to be passed within one month from the end of the month in which the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel are received-Order passed about five months late-Timeline is mandatory-Order, computation sheet and demand notice quashed. [S. 143, 144B, 156]
Zynga Game Network India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2026) 309 Taxman 322 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Failure to provide personal hearing through video conferencing against proposed variation and video conference was duly scheduled-Assessing Officer passed final order before such hearing-Order violated section 144B(6)(vii) and principles of natural justice-Order was quashed and set aside . [S. 143(3),144B(6)(vii), Art . 226]
Sanjiv Manoharlal Sethi v .Dy .CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 311 (Bom)(HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Non-existing entity-Order passed in the name of non-existing amalgamated entities despite revenue’s knowledge-Application for additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC allowed-SLP dismissed. [S. 143, 260A, CPC Order XLI Rule 27, Art. 136]
Dy. CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. [2026] 309 Taxman 501/488 ITR 624 (SC). Editorial: Reliance Industries Ltd. v. P. L. Roongta [2025] 171 taxmann.com 467 /479 ITR 770 (Bom)(HC)
S. 139: Return of income-Condonation of delay-Return uploaded eight minutes late owing to portal issues-Carry forward of business loss of about Rs. 21.33 crores denied under section 80-Minimal delay condoned to prevent grave hardship. [S. 44AB, 80, 119(2)(b), 139(1), Art. 226]
Sikkim Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CBDT (2026) 309 Taxman 148 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 127: Power to transfer cases-Income-tax authorities-A transfer under section 127 remains valid notwithstanding the quashing of the search under section 132. [S.132, 133A, Art. 136]
Pawan Kaur Goel v. Pr. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 248 /488 ITR 654 (SC) Editorial: Pawan Kumar Goel v. PCIT [2026] 182 taxmann.com 507 (P & H) (HC)
S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Property held for charitable purposes-Exemption denied due to 50 days delay in filing audit report Form 10B-Delay was condoned and directed to grant the exemption. [S. 11, 12A, 119(2)(b), Form No.10B, Art. 226]
Dawat E Islami Hind v. CIT (E) [2026] 309 Taxman 531 (Bom)(HC)