This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bogus transactions-Change of opinion-Borrowed satisfaction-Lack of application of mind-Reopening invalid. [S. 68, 148, 151]

CIT v. Capseal Vyapaar P. Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 47 (Guwahati)(Trib.)

S. 145: Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profits-Addition was deleted-Delay in appeal –Delay of 880 days-Delay was condoned. [S. 144, 145(3),253, Rule 46A]

Devendra Thakershibhai Thakkar v. ITO (2025) 172 taxmann.com 504 / 121 ITR 69 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.).

S. 145: Method of accounting-Rejection of Books-Estimation of Profit-Form 26AS Difference-Loan Waiver-One-time settlement. Additions were deleted. [S. 145(3), 28(iv), 41(1), 145(3)]

Dy. CIT v. NAPC P. Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 544 / 174 taxmann.com 105 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Assessment-Transfer Pricing –CBDT Notifications-Assessment was time-barred-Invalid. [S. 143(3), 144B, 144C(3), 153(4)]

Dy. CIT v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 298 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Suppression of Sales-Consignment sales are treated as unaccounted sales-Only gross profit and investment in purchases are taxable, not the entire sale proceeds. [S. 69]

CIT v. Nav Bharat Trading Company (2025) 121 ITR 7 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 143(2): Assessment-Notice-Jurisdiction-Notice by Assessing Officer-Pecuniary jurisdiction-Non-issue of mandatory notice-The assessment was held to be void ab initio and was quashed. (S. 143(3)]

Raju Biswas v. ITO (2025) 121 ITR 92 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S.142(2A): Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Satisfaction of Assessing Officer-Extension of time-Special audit order is void where satisfaction is not independently recorded by the Assessing Officer and statutory procedure under sections 142(2A) and 142(2C) is not followed.[S. 143(3), 153]

Dy. CIT v. Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. (2025) 174 taxmann.com 170 / 121 ITR 14 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 120: Jurisdiction of income-tax authorities-Assessment-Jurisdiction-Additional Commissioner acting as Assessing Officer-Absence of authorisation under sections 120(4)(b) and 127-Assessment without jurisdiction liable to be quashed-Additional legal grounds challenging jurisdiction admissible before Tribunal.
[S. 2(7A), 120(4)(b), 124(3), 127, 143(3), 144C, 254(1)]

ITO (IT) v. Tata Steel Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 641 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C: Transfer Pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparables-Functionally dissimilar companies are to be excluded while determining the arm’s length price. [S. 92CA, 92F]

Here Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 170 taxmann.com 583 / 121 ITR 42 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Export Commission-Adjustment was deleted-Royalty and technical know-how-Revenue expenditure-Expenditure incurred on glow signboards, signage, sales tools and dealer fixtures was also held to be revenue expenditure-Education cess-Not allowable as deduction-Dividend Distribution Tax-Matter remanded to the file of Assessing Officer. [S.37(1), 40(a)(ii)]

Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 121 ITR 92 (Delhi)(Trib).