This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparable companies-Related party transactions filter-Companies having 99 per cent. and 100 per cent. related party transactions-To be excluded from final set of comparables–Assessing Officer obligated to compute income in conformity with arm’s length price determined by Transfer Pricing Officer-Assessing Officer changing cost allocation methodology from headcount ratio to salary expense ratio, partly disallowing support services cost-Not proper-Depreciation on intangible assets being customer contracts and assembled workforce-Allowable-Deduction of tax at source-Credit for-Assessing Officer directed to verify and grant credit for tax deducted at source, advance tax and self-assessment tax.[S. 32(1)(ii), 92B , 92CA(3), 92 CA(4)]
Genpact Services LLC v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 612 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S.145: Method of accounting-Project-completion method-Real estate developer-Sale proceeds recognised only upon obtaining completion certificate and handing over possession, not during year under consideration-No sales effected or possession handed over during relevant year-Ad hoc addition based on registration of sale deeds not justified-Allocation of common expenses among group companies based on business volume accepted by Department in earlier years-Project-completion method regularly followed-No discrepancy pointed out in audited accounts-Ad hoc disallowance not justified. [S. 43CA ,143(3)]
VTP Mohite Associates v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 580(Pune) (Trib.)
S. 56 :Income from other sources-Income-Search and seizure-Fraudulent Income-tax refunds obtained through bogus challans-Income invested in shares and deposits-Assessee having tangible control and dominion over funds-Taxable on accrual, not merely on receipt-Recovery or repayment in subsequent years cannot negate taxability in year of accrual-Deduction for recovery/repayment not allowable under section 57-Fraudulent income taxable under “Income from other sources-Offences and prosecution-Execution of false challans with intent to defraud Income-tax Department-Revenue authorities directed to take deterrent action permitted by law. [S.2(24), 57, 132, 277 ,Indian Penal Code, 1860, S. 177, 193, 196, 199]
Mukesh Rasiklal Shah v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 536(Ahd) (Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue expenditure-Brand relaunch expenses spread over three years-Activity not enlarging profit-making apparatus nor new line of business-Substantially revenue expenditure though benefit accruing over years-Not capital merely because benefit flows over more than one year-No enduring advantage in capital field-Expenditure allowable-Disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income-No exempt income earned during year-Explanation introduced by Finance Act, 2022 prospective, not applicable-No disallowance called for-Accrual of liability-Expenditure disallowed as prior period expenses-Ascertained and crystallised during the year-No deduction claimed in earlier years-Allowable in year of crystallisation-Deduction only on actual payment-Delayed payment of employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ State insurance-Not allowable. Payments to foreign agencies for services rendered abroad-Payees having no permanent establishment in India-Payments not taxable in hands of non-residents under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements-Cannot be disallowed for failure to deduct tax at source. Commissioner (Appeals) directing Assessing Officer to reconcile difference between interest receipts and bad debts-Mere directions for verification-No interference called for. [S. 2(24)(x), 9(1)(vii), 14A , 40(a)(i) , 43B , 250 , 254(1)]
Express Publications (Madurai) P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 519(Chennai) (Trib.)
S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Interest-free loans given to related concerns-Nexus between borrowed funds and loans advanced not established-Presumption that funds advanced first out of interest-free funds available-Disallowance not justified.
Express Publications (Madurai) P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 519(Chennai) (Trib.)
S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident –Fees for technical services or royalty-Simple rendering of services not sufficient, technical know-how must be “made available”-Services of Singapore and Hong Kong companies utilised to deliver services to clients in Vietnam-Services rendered outside India for income from source outside India-Not taxable in India-Disallowance unjustified-Reimbursement of salary expenses to foreign companies-No income element-Not chargeable to tax in India-No obligation to deduct tax at source-Disallowance deleted-Payments for management and consulting support services rendered and utilised outside India-Exclusionary provision applies-Not taxable in India-Disallowance deleted-Royalty-Payments for use of trademarks and training materials of foreign universities utilised for business outside India-Exclusionary provision applies-Not taxable in India-Disallowance deleted-“Make available” clause-Payments to foreign institutions for training, accreditation and consultancy services-No technical knowledge, experience or skill made available-Not fees for technical services-Not taxable in India-Disallowance unsustainable-Independent personal services-Payment to non-resident individual professional for services rendered abroad-No fixed base or stay exceeding 90 days in India-Income taxable only in country of residence-Not chargeable to tax in India-No obligation to deduct tax at source-Disallowance deleted-DTAA-India-UK , USA. [S. 9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii)(b) 195, Art. 12 , 15]
QAI India Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 494(Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Non-resident-Permanent establishment-Service permanent establishment-Employees required to be physically present and furnish services in India exceeding 90 days (or 30 days for related enterprises) in a fiscal year-Services furnished only for 44 days after excluding vacation, business development and common days-No service permanent establishment-Business profits not taxable in India.-Virtual service permanent establishment-Concept not provided under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement or officially endorsed in India-Requirement of physical rendition of service alone to be applied-Return-Delay in filing-Interest-Assessee contending return filed within extended due date-Matter remanded for verification-Interest-Advance tax-Income received after deduction of tax at source-Levy of interest for failure to pay advance tax not called for-Income-Accrual-Amounts appearing in Form 26AS cannot automatically be treated as income-Assessing Officer to verify and grant corresponding credit of tax deducted at source if payments not actually received. DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 4, 5 , 234A , 234B Art. 5(6) , Form No 26AS]
Clifford Chance Pte. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 470 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue–Real estate business-Change in method of accounting from percentage-of-completion to completed-contract method-Change revenue-neutral, following Accounting Standards, verified by auditors and accepted in subsequent years-No loss to exchequer-Principal Commissioner’s directions to reconsider financial expenses, depreciation, current liabilities, deduction under section 80-IAB, house property income, loans and advances to related parties, etc.-Matters already examined by Assessing Officer-No indication of how order erroneous-Revision amounting to fishing and roving enquiries-Assessment order not prejudicial to Revenue-Revision quashed. [S. 2(22)(e), 80-IAB, 145]
DLF Assets Ltd v. PCIT (2025) 132 ITR 448 (Delhi) (Trib.) DLF Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 132 ITR 448 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 80P : Co-operative societies –Interest income from fixed deposits with scheduled banks, personal loans to employees and house building loans not attributable to business of providing credit facilities to members-Deduction rightly denied-Commission, miscellaneous and sundry receipts not attributable to business of providing credit facilities-Deduction rightly denied. Income-Method of accounting-Overdue interest on non-performing assets-Income recognition-Matter remanded to exclude interest only if supported by statutory guidelines or accounting standards-Assessment-Income from other sources-Expenses against interest income-No further expenses allowable beyond those already claimed in computation of income-Disallowance confirmed Principles of natural justice-Alleged lack of opportunity before Commissioner (Appeals)-Appellate order passed after considering submissions-No violation was found.[S.4, 80P(2)(a)(1), 80P(2(d) 143(3), 250]
West Bengal State Co-operative Agri and Rural Development Bank Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 434 (Kol) (Trib.)
S. 9(1)(ii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Salaries-
Non-resident-Salary income-Services rendered outside India while on deputation from Indian company-Assessee non-resident in India and tax resident of Australia-Salary received in India for employment exercised in Australia-Australian tax return accepted as evidence of residency-Tax residency certificate filed at appellate stage accepted-Exemption allowable-Scope of total income-Salary received in India for services rendered abroad-Not taxable in India when employment exercised outside India-DTAA-India-Australia. [S. 9(1)(ii), 15, 90, Art 15]
Yogesh Kotiyal v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 132 ITR 419 (Delhi) (Trib.)