The AO initiated reassessment proceedings on ground that subsidy received by assessee from Government was directly credited to capital reserve account which resulted into non-consideration of such amount for computation of assessee’s book profit. On writ the court held that there was sufficient disclosure in return filed by the assessee with respect to entry in question and same was also noticed by AO during scrutiny assessment proceedings. Accordingly the Court held that the reassessment proceedings had been initiated merely on basis of change of opinion hence notice was quashed. (AY. 2012-13)
Pandesara Infrastructure Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2019) 105 taxmann.com 181 / 263 Taxman 367 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, Dy. CIT v. Pandesara Infrastructure Ltd. (2019) 263 Taxman 366 (SC)
S. 147 : Reassessment–After the expiry of four years-Book profit-Subsidy received by assessee from Government was directly credited to capital reserve account-Sufficient disclosure of facts– Reassessment is held to be bad in law.[S. 115JB, 148]