The Assessing Officer assessed the excess amount received by the partner as capital gains. Tribunal deleted the addition. On appeal by the Revenue High Court affirmed the order of the Tribunal. On appeal by the Revenue the assessee contended that the excess amount was towards goodwill. The Court held that there was no discussion in the judgment of the High Court on any submission on the lines addressed before the court. Court held that the High Court would bear in mind the state of the law and the amendments engrafted later on. The matter remanded to the High Court for reconsideration. (AY.2009-10)
PCIT v. R. F. Nangrani HUF (2023)454 ITR 426/ 293 Taxman 511/ 332 CTR 510/ 225 DTR 217 (SC) Editorial : Order of High Court is set aside and remanded, CIT v. R. F. Nangrani HUF (Bom)(HC) (ITA No. 33 of 2016 dt 18-4 2018)
S. 45 : Capital gains-Retirement-Firm-Excess of amount due-Goodwill-No discussion in the judgement-Matter remanded to the High court for reconsideration.