The Assessing Officer disallowed the participatory development expenses.The Tribunal held that it was mandatory for assessee, which was a mining industry, to look after development of area in which mines were operating to create employment opportunities, provide educational facility to children etc. Tribunal also noted that CSR expenditures incurred prior to assessment year 2015-16 were allowable as business expenditure as same were incurred wholly and exclusively for purpose of business. No substantial question of law. arose for consideration against impugned order of Tribunal. (AY. 2014-15)
PCIT v. Ramesh Prasad Sao (2023) 295 Taxman 755 (Cal.)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Participatory development expenses-CSR expenditures-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.