Question And Answer | |
---|---|
Subject: | CREDIT OF ADVANCE TAX PAID IN INCOME DECLARATION SCHEME-2016-Issue of reassessment notice u/s 148 |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Querist: | SHIRISH MADHUSUDAN KULKARNI |
Answered by: | Research Team |
Tags: | advance tax, Reassessment notice, writ |
Date: | July 31, 2021 |
- CREDIT FOR ADVANCE TAX WAS TAKENĀ FOR THE INCOME DECLARED UNDER THE INCOME DECLARATION SCHEME
- FORM WAS SUBMITTED ONLINE- CPC
- CREDIT WAS ALLOWED TO FORMS FILED PHYSICALLY BUT CPC HAS NOT TAKEN ANY ACTION
NOW 148 NOTICE IS ISSUED BY ITO
WHAT COULD BE REMEDY
The assessee has to verify what is the date of the notice . In case the notice is dated after 1, -4 -2021 the Assessing officer has to follow the law as mandated under section 148A of the Act . .ie. Conducting inquiry , providing opportunity before issue of notice under section 148 of the Act. If the notice refers the section 148 then the assessee can write to the issuing authority to drop the proceedings as it is not in accordance with law and hence bad in law . If no response is received within reasonable time , the assessee may challenge the notice by filing the writ petition . Bombay High court and other High Courts have admitted number of petitions on the issue of notice without following the due process of law and stayed the proceedings . Refer Tata Communications Transformation services Ltd v. CIT www.itatonline .org The assessee has to verify what is the date of the notice . In case the notice is dated after 1, -4 -2021 the Assessing officer has to follow the law as mandated under section 148A of the Act . .ie. Conducting inquiry , providing opportunity before issue of notice under section 148 of the Act. If the notice refers the section 148 then the assessee can write to the issuing authority to drop the proceedings as it is not in accordance with law and hence bad in law . If no response is received within reasonable time , the assessee may challenge the notice by filing the writ petition . Bombay High court and other High Courts have admitted number of petitions on the issue of notice without following the due process of law and stayed the proceedings . Refer Tata Communications Transformation services Ltd v. CIT www.itatonline .org
Tata Communications Transformation Services Limited
In case the assessee is not desires to file writ petition the assessee may file the return under protest , request for recorded reason , file objections after receipt of recorded reasons and after assessment the follow the normal course of appeal .
In case the notice is dated on or before 31 -3 -2021 , the assessee may have to file the return under protest and request for recorded reasons . When assesesee receives the recorded reason the assessee has to file the detailed reply , wherein the assessee can request for dropping of the reassessment proceedings . In case the order is passed by the assessing Officer disposing the objection , the assessee may file writ petition against the order disposing of objections . By following the guidelines referred by supreme Court GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. DCIT (2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC)
and Bombay High Court in Asian Paint Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 90 (Bom.)(HC), Allana Cold Storage Ltd v. ITO (2006) 287 ITR 1 (Bom.) (HC)
. In case the quantum is negligible the assessee may follow the normal assessment procedure and appeal may be filed after receipt of the order .
.
THANKS FOR THE REPLY
THE NOTICE U/S 148 IS ISSUED ON 30TH MARCH 2021
AS SUCH THE SAME CANNOT BE CHALLENGED
THE PROBLEM IS NOW HOW TO FACE THE NOTICE WHICH IS NOT UNJUSTIFIABLE
THE SITUATION AROSE SINCE CPC HAD NOT CONSIDERED ADVANCE TAX PAID FOR EARLIER YEARS AND DID NOT ISSUE FINAL CERTIFICATE UNDER IDS SCHEME
WHEREAS FINA CERTIFICATE WAS ISSUED FOR THOSE CASES WHO FILED FORM IN PHYSICAL LMODE AT LOCAL CIT