Question And Answer
Subject: Late return of income filed pursuant to time limit provided in the notice u/s 148
Category: 
Querist: Abhilash
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: March 19, 2023
Query asked by Abhilash

Notice under section 148 was issued on 22 March 2017 which mentioned that return of income needs to filed within 30 days. However ROI pursuant to notice under section 148 was filed on 15 December 2017 i.e., after the due date mentioned in 148 notice. Order was passed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act. Is it still mandatory to issue notice under section 143(2) even if the ROI was filed beyond the time limit provided in notice under section 148?

File Uploaded: Not Available


The issuance of a Notice under section 143(2) of the Act is mandatory irrespective of when the return of income is filed. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of PCIT v. Marck Biosciences Ltd [2019] 106 taxmann.com 399 (Gujarat) held that an assessment order passed without the issuance of valid notice under section 143(2) of the Act would be rendered invalid.



Disclaimer: This article is only for general information and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers desiring legal advice should consult with an experienced professional to understand the current law and how it may apply to the facts of their case. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org
One comment on “Late return of income filed pursuant to time limit provided in the notice u/s 148
  1. S Rajeswara Rao, Adv. says:

    In the case of ITO-IV(4) vs. M/s. Shri Krishna Dutta Academy in ITA No. 565,566 and 568/LKW/2011 order dated 28/05/2023, the ld. ITAT, Lucknow Bench has held that return filed beyond due date specified in notice u/s.148 cannot be treated as non-est in view of provisions of sec. 234A of the Act.
    So in my humble opinion issuance of notice u/s.143(2) is necessary.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*