The assessee had issues that had gone to ITAT for ASST YEAR 2006-07 and thereafter AO gave appeal effect order.THEREAFTER the AO compared normal income and 115JB calculations .However in 115JB calculations the AO ignored 88E which per settled law is allowable from tax on 115JB income(PER KARNATAKA HC AND DELDI HC).The AO granted LOWER refunds on basis of 115JB calculations as it is higher on TAXABILITY as rebate was denied of section 88E from tax on 115JB.BEFORE CIT(A) AND ITAT 88E AND 115JB THINGS WERE CONSEQUENTIAL ISSUE AS STT AND NON STT INCOME CALULATIONS WERE MAIN ISSUES. QUESTIONS 1.WHAT…
► Read Answer
Company "A" has assigned the loan (a fully written-off loan account) to the NBFC in the year 2021 at a discounted value (lower value as compared to the original debt obligation). The loan was taken over by NBFC because NBFC is hope full of that it will recover the higher amount in the future. The Borrower against the loan (original debt) has allotted redeemable preference shares (RPS) of Rs 100/- each at par to the NBFC. The Borrower's net worth pre-allotment of RPS is negative. The query is What will be the tax impact on NBFC when the loan is…
► Read Answer
A COMPANY HAD DEDUCTED TDS OF RS. 50 LACS WHICH WAS PAID LATE BY 7 MONTHS DUE TO COVID 19 AND FINANCIAL CRISIS. THE SAID TDS WAS PAID LATE WITH APPLICABLE INTEREST AND LATE FEES. ALSO THE TAX WITH INTEREST AND RETURN WITH LATE FEES WAS FILED VOLUNTARILY BEFORE RECEIVING ANY NOTICE. NOW AFTER 2 YEARS, THE DIRECTOR HAS RECEIVED NOTICE FOR INIATIATING PROSECUTION AS THE COMPANY HAD COMMITTED DEFAULT AND IS A PERSON IN DEFAULT. WHAT REPLY SHOULD BE FILED TO AVOID PROSECUTION?
► Read Answer
Respected Sir, Can you share the judgement, wherein it has been held that - if the seller of immovable property is NRI, the buyer can deduct tax (TDS) on NET CAPITAL GAIN if the seller furnishes CA CERTIFICATE WITH CAPITAL GAIN WORKING.
► Read Answer
Assessee is private limited co , engaged in the business of construction and development of real estate project. the co hold two lands one is considered as stock in trade and another land is shown as investment which was purchased eight years bank. Now assessee co has decided to sold both the lands and accordingly executed the conveyance deed against the consideration to be received in form of constructed area after 24 months. The assesee co has also hand over the possession of the said land to the buyer of the land. consultant of the Purchaser is saying the tax…
► Read Answer
TO MY QN. LAST SENT A FEW DAYS AGO, LOOK FWD FOR YOUR EXPERTS' ANSWER /OPINION ! Admn. WILL YOU PASS ON MY FEED INPUT SUPLLIED VIA A MESSAGE SENT THROUGH FB A FEW MiNUTES ago !?
► Read Answer
AS A FREELANCE JOURNALIST, I GET A INCOME UNDER 194J FOR MY REPORTING / EDITING. I SHOW THIS INCOME UNDER 44AD OR 44ADA OR JUST UNDER 'OTHER INCOME' IN MY INCOME TAX RETURNS? FREELANCE JOURNALIST IS A PROFESSION BUT NOT COVERED BY 44AD OR 44ADA - NO MENTION OF THE TERM 'JOUNARLIST'. PLEASE GIVE YOUR OPNION ON THIS. THANK YOU
► Read Answer
Should not the deduction u/s Sec 80TTB for Rs. 50,000, being a standard deduction , same way as the standard deduction in respect of salary income, be allowed to a SC/SSC irrespective of his opting for the old or new regime; especially if he claims no other ineligible deduction as specified ? NOTE: Refer the Poser raised with the CBDT/CPC , also vide Post on FB/ Linkedin, to which no response has been received so far.
► Read Answer
Assessee is an individual and partner in partnership firm engaged in the business of advertising. In the A.Y. 2008-09. Assessee has capital long term gain other than land and building amounting to Rs. 3.25 cr. Assessee has invested the entire amount for purchase of bungalow along with the land . The area of constructed bungalow is about 20000 sq.ft and area of land on which bungalow constructed is 60000 sq.ft Assessee has executed registered the Development Agreement and power of attorney by paying full stamp duty and also taken the possession of the said property. The assessee has not carried out…
► Read Answer
Dear Sir, Assessee received notice dated 20.05.2022 u/s 148A(b) in consequence to Hon'ble SC Order dated 04.05.2022. Assessee's case relates to LTCG. The information mentioned in the notice addressed to the assessee is totally wrong 1. name of the company in which assessee did purchase and sell of shares as per AO is wrong. 2. Amount of shares purchased and sold is wrong. 3. Name of broker to whom assessee purchase and sale of shares is wrong. Assessee filed reply in response to notice u/s 148A(b) mentioning that information given by you is wrong. Now, the assessee approached the concerned…
► Read Answer
SECTION 88E AND 115JB