The deduction claimed was wrong and 148 notice issued for income escaping assessment. When the wrong deduction now rectified and showing the correct income in ITR filed u/s 148, which return will be considered by the ITO.
► Read Answer
Reassessment Summary – A.Y. 2017-18 Original Notice u/s 148The first notice under section 148 was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO), Ward 31(1)(1), Mumbai on 27.04.2021, i.e., during the transition period between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021. Subsequent Proceedings post-Ashish Agarwal JudgmentAfter the Ashish Agarwal decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, a notice under section 148A(b) was issued on 26.05.2022 by ITO Ward 2(2)(3), Mumbai (a different officer).Thereafter, the order u/s 148A(d) and fresh notice u/s 148 were issued on 30.07.2022, after obtaining approval from the PCIT. Issues for Consideration Jurisdictional Validity of NoticeThe reassessment notice u/s 148 can be issued…
► Read Answer
what is the impact of such petitions filed with /without identity against any tax payer by a complainant ? Is it an evidence for 148/263 etc ?
► Read Answer
LTCG declared under ids 2016 but its cost was not disclosed being a payment from disclosed bank a/c can ao issue notice u/s 148 for taxing cost of penny stock ? any case law ?
► Read Answer
AO2 passes an order u/s 148A[3] without any notice u/s 129 and or a fresh notice u/s 148A[1] etc and relies upon notice u/s 148A[1] by AO 1 and reply by me to AO 1 what is the remedy ?
► Read Answer
Sir in my client case IT dept got an information during a search conducted at the premises of the supplier from whom my client used to purchase goods that my client had made a payment of Rs. 863000/_ to the supplier in cash for payment of goods, hence to verify the same case of my client re opened and now has alleged that why this as much amount of cash payment shhould be added in income u/s 69C of IT Act. however during reassessment proceding my client had furnished all the bills and copy of a/c of supplier alongwith bank…
► Read Answer
Assesse has been carrying on the business of lending money on interest, he has offered the income of interest u/s Section 44AD at 88% against the statutory requirement of 6%. 12% of the income have been incurred on expenses such as Bank charges, Depreciation, insurance of Car and its running expenses, salary of accountant/manager and Telephone Expenses. The case have been reopened for the A.Y. 2020-21 u/s 148 of the I.T Act, 1961 on the ground that income should have been offered under the head of Income from Other sources. Query: Whether the action of the A.O is justified? Any…
► Read Answer
whether exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) can claim against notice of section 148 for AY 2016-2017
► Read Answer
Appellant has given loan of Rs. 30,00,000/- in F.Y. 2008-09 to ABC through banking channels. Just before the debit of Rs. 30,00,000/- there is a credit in the bank A/c on account of repayment of loan received by the Appellant from his debtor which was given two years back through banking channels. Interest on the said amount and TDS thereon is reflected in Form 26AS and shown in ITR. On the basis of search in the case of ABC it was concluded by the Investigation wing that the loan of Rs. 30,00,000/- is accomodation entry. Notice u/s 148 was issued…
► Read Answer
1. What will happen to cases below Rs 50 lacs beyond 3 years ? 2. What will happen to cases where approvals were granted but notices u/s 148A were neven issued ? 3. What will happen to cases which are now time barred ?
► Read Answer
148 notice issued for wrong deduction claimed in original return