Court held that expense were not connected to the work undertaken by the assessee and was bogus expense. As regards the additional ground that was raised, by a reasoned order, the Tribunal had considered it to a certain extent which covered the partly allowed claim by the Commissioner (Appeals) and taking into consideration the tax deducted at source deposited by the assessee. A reasoned order had been passed disallowing the claim of the assessee. No substantial question of law. (AY. 2010-11)
Ramesh Harbibhau Gawli v. ITO (2024)467 ITR 9 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Ramesh Harbibhau Gawli v. ITO (2024)467 ITR 161 (SC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bogus expenses-Construction business-Payments made to Sub-contractors-TDS is deducted-Order of Tribunal confirming the disallowance is affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S.260A]