Ramprasad Kamtaprasad Nigam v.ITO ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org .

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment -Disallowance of claim under section 54 of the Act – Levy of penalty is not justified . [ S. 54 ]

The assessee made an investment in  SRA project and claimed exemption under section 54 of the Act . The claim was disallowed and the assessee has not filed an appeal against the disallowance . The Assessing Officer levied the penalty under section 271 (1)( c) of the Act for furnishing in accurate particulars of income .  The order of the Assessing Officer is affirmed by the CIT( A). On appeal the  Tribunal relying on the ratio in CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd  (2010)  322 ITR 158 ( SC)  held that the  appellant had infact disclosed the amount of capital gains and only aspect is that the claim for exemption was disallowed which cannot lead to an order of imposition of penalty. Accordingly the  penalty  levied was deleted .   ( ITA NO. 2839/MUM/2023 dt. 12 -12 -2023 ) ( AY. 2015 -16 )