Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 45 : Capital gains-Sale of shares held as investment–Indexed cost of acquisition-Cannot be assessed as business income–Issue of bonus shares is held to be justified – Sale of shares at cost-Short term capital loss allowable to be set off against long term capital gains-Transaction cannot be held to be colourable device to set off… Read More ...
The High Court of Delhi has held that Hon'ble High Court of Delhi quashed and set aside the notice issued under section 148A(b) and order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the ground that notice under section 148A(b) violates the provisions of section 282A as the name and designation of the concerned officer issuing the said notice finds no… Read More ...
The ITAT INDORE has held that Project Completion Method vs. Percentage Completion Method Scope of limited Scrutiny KEY Observations: Observations of the Hon. ITAT 1. The order of the AO was held as erroneous so far as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue on the ground that the AO has not examined applicability of the Percentage Completion Method. 2. It… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 12AB : Procedure for fresh registration-Cancellation of registration-Withdrawal of registration cannot be done retrospectively Commissioner Central has no jurisdiction to cancel the registration–Cancellation of registration was quashed-Alternative contentions became academic hence not dealt with. [S. 11, 12A, 12AB(4), 13] The asseessee is a Charitable Trust which was set up vide trust deed dated April… Read More ...
The High Court of Bombay has held that Facts of the case In order to ensure finality and certainty as to taxability of income by way of dividends, interest and capital gains that Petitioner earned from sources in India, he made an application to Authority for Advance Ruling. AAR by applying provisions of India-UAE DTAA held that Petitioner was resident of UAE, Petitioner… Read More ...
The High Court of Delhi has held that Facts of the case Assessing Officer had levied the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of disallowance under section 43B. Assessee had filed original return of income on 30.11.2014 for A.Y. 2014-15. The original return of income was revised by the assessee on 01.09.2016. The revision in return of income… Read More ...
The High Court of Gujarat has held that Facts of the case The assessee had claimed excess depreciation on land component of the properties. The Assessing Officer did not ascertain the same. However, before the Ld. CIT (Appeals), the assessee had suo motu made submission regarding this. In order to align its books of accounts with MCA notification, the assessee had itself disclosed… Read More ...
The High Court of Bombay has held that Facts of the case During the course of reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer, after considering the depositions and affidavits filed before the Sales Tax Authority, came to a conclusion that the entities from whom the assessee had made purchases were only indulged in bogus accommodation entries without supply of goods. Accordingly, the purchases amounting to… Read More ...
The BOMBAY HIGH COURT has held that S. 45 : Capital gains -Penny Stock-Cash credits –Accommodation entries - DMAT account and contract note showed details of share transaction- Assessing Officer had not proved said transaction as bogus, capital gain earned on said transaction cannot be treated as cash credits - Addition as cash credit was deleted- Order of Tribunal allowing the exemption… Read More ...
The High Court of Delhi has held that Facts of the case During previous year relevant to A.Y. 2005-06, the assessee had taken loan from the bank. During the period spanning between A.Y. 2005-06 to A.Y. 2011-12, interest on loan paid by the assessee to the bank was allowed as deductible expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is only… Read More ...