Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The High Court of Bombay has held that Hon'ble High Court held that if the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 merely quotes the information flagged on the insight portal without neither depicting therein the results of the independent investigation conducted if any of the said information by the Assessing Officer nor connecting the assessee to the transactions specified… Read More ...
The Calcutta High Court has held that In cases where there is a discrepancy between the income figures in the TDS certificate and Form 26AS, the income figure shown in Form 26AS should be taken as the basis for computing the assessee's income. This is because Form 26AS is generated by the Income-tax department and is not under the control of the… Read More ...
The Calcutta High court has held that Indu Goenka Vs Assessment Unit, Income-tax department & Ors(Calcutta High Court) Date-16th March 2023 Sub-Whether assessment completed without following standard operating procedure is a valid assessment? The Division bench of Calcutta high court in this case was considering an intra court appeal where Justice Nizamuddin refused to interfere against challenge to the assessment order which… Read More ...
The Gujarat High Court has held that Section 153C read with section 144 orders and penalty orders quashed and set aside for de novo adjudication on the ground of no opportunity of hearing being given to the assessee, the same were sent on old email address of the assessee Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that The reopening of the assessment based on a different method of computation or application of the section is nothing but a change of opinion, which is impermissible in law. The assessments were completed, and the Officer verified the only transaction during the year under consideration. Thus, there was true and full disclosure of the facts. Read More ...
The High Court of Bombay has held that Reassessment proceedings under section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be initiated merely for verification of the information reflected on the Insight Portal. Only after the Assessing Officer has duly verified the information reflected on the Insight Portal, he is vested with the power to initiate reassessment proceedings. Read More ...
The Rajkot Tribunal has held that Denying the exemption under Section 80P of the Act merely on the ground of belated filing of return by the assessee is not justifiable. Read More ...
The Pune ITAT has held that Explanation 5 to Section 32 of the Act is not applicable in a case, when the department has not thrusted the depreciation on the assessee and allowed the same while computing the income of the assessee. In such a scenario ‘actual cost’ of the asset would be treated as ‘WDV’ of the asset, since no… Read More ...
The Calcutta High Court has held that Orbit Projects Pvt ltd Vs ITO, Ward 5(1),Kolkata & Ors Date-2nd March 2023 Sub-Whether an Assessing officer ignoring the judgement of Calcutta high court in the case of assessee itself issue a fresh notice u/s 148 disregarding the fact that the company in whose name the notice is issued is no longer in existence and… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 56 : Income from other sources-Relative-Individual-Private discretionary trust-Gift of equity shares to trust-Trust crested for the benefit of self and relatives-Any sum received without consideration, aggregate value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees-Pass through entity-Provision of section 56(2)(x) is not applicable. [S. 56(2)(x)] The assessee is a private discretionary trust. Settlor Mrs Archana Miglani… Read More ...