Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it

Chander Arjandas Manwani v. National Faceless Assessment (Bombay High Court)

The Bombay High Court has held that S. 143 (3) : Assessment - E-Assessment - Non furnishing draft assessment order - Order not having been passed in conformity with the requirements of the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 held to be non-est and shall be deemed to have never been passed-Order was quashed and set aside. [S. 143(3A), 143(3B), Art. 226] In response… Read More ...

Ananta Land Mark Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (Bombay High Court)

The Bombay High Court has held that S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Interest income-Deduction-Change of opinion-No power of review-Reassessment is held to be bad in law [S. 37(1), 56, 57, 148 , Art. 226] The assessee is engaged in the business of real estate and development. The assessment was completed u/s. 143 (3) of… Read More ...

Michel E. Desa v. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 72 : Set off of loss-long term capital loss-Tax planning with in frame work of law is permissible -Long term capital loss is allowed to be set off against long term capital gains. [S. 45] (ITA No. 4286/Mum/2017, dt.20-9-2021) (AY. 2010-11) Coram: Hon'ble Shri Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Hon'ble Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial… Read More ...

Pr. CIT v. Dhananjay Mishra (Bombay High Court)

The Bombay High Court has held that S. 69C : unexplained expenditure-Bogus hawala purchases-Third party statement-Opportunity of cross examination was not provided-Payments were through banking channels by way of letter of credit-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition was affirmed-No question of law. [S. 260A] (ITA No. 971 of 2017 dt. 28-9-2021) (AY. 2010-11) (Arising ITA No. 7287/M/2014 dt.7-10-2016) CORAM : Hon'ble Mr.… Read More ...

Dove consultants ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT DELHI)

The ITAT DELHI has held that REOPENING BASED ON INFORMATION MUST BE RELIABLE AND SOME EVIDENCE TO BELIEVE PURCHASE AS BOGUS , PROCEEDINGS QUASHED BY DELHI ITAT . ITA No.1197/Del/2019 GIST 7. We have considered the rival contentions of both the Ld. Representative of the parties. A perusal of the reasons recorded for reopening of the assessment (as reproduced above) would… Read More ...

PCIT, Kolkata-2 Vs V N Enterprises Limited (Calcutta High Court)

The Calcutta High Court has held that PCIT,Kolkata-2 Vs V N Enterprises Limited Date-30th September,2021 Forum-Calcutta High Court Assessment Yrs 2002-03/2003-04 Sub-Whether blending of tea leaves amounts to manufacture within the meaning of Section 10B of the Income-tax Act,1961 to be eligible for deduction under the said section. The Calcutta High Court CJ bench was considering the appeal of the department where… Read More ...

Shiva Cement Limited & Ors Vs DIT(Inv) & Ors (Orissa High Court)

The Orissa High Court has held that Shiva Cement Limited & Ors Vs DIT(Inv) Bhubaneshwar & Ors Forum-Orissa High Court Date-29th September,2021 Sub-Whether there can be common search warrant and Panchnama where two assessees are operating from the same place and whether there can be simultaneous search and survey operations simultaneously in respect of same assessee. The Orissa High Court in this… Read More ...

Hitesh G Somani vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

The ITAT, Ahmedabad has held that When assessee purchased three flats at single floor and combined them with one entry and exit and got them registered through a single sale deed, assessee was entitle to claim exemption u/s 54 even after amendment applicable from A.Y. 2015-16 Read More ...

ACIT vs. Krishna Coil Cutters P Ltd (ITAT Ahmedabad)

The ITAT, Ahmedabad has held that When Company advancing money to a company which was a substantial shareholders for mutual business benefits and when such advancement was on interest at prevailing market rates and when company advancing funds was also engaged in money lending activities, money received by shareholder company cannot be taxed as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act. Read More ...

DCIT v. Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S.68: Cash credits-Share application money-Shell company-The DCF method adopted is incorrect and fallacious-the two investing companies held to fit the description of a shell company-The burden is on the assessee to prove the identity, capacity and genuineness and nature and source of credits in his books of accounts, to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer… Read More ...