Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT has held that There is complete non-application of mind as the Assessing officer didn’t convert the information per se into tangible material. He just relied on the general information and he didn’t make any inquiry or apply his mind to the information received. The assessing officer should form nexus between information, reason, and belief. This is absent in… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Survey-Assessment under section 153A is bad in law as there was no search in the name of Assessee-Proper satisfaction was not recorded-No incriminating documents were found in the case of person whom the search was initiated-Even the Assessing Officer is same recording of satisfaction is mandatory-Order was quashed on law and merit… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that *Krishna Gopal Tiwari & another Vs Union of India* *Forum-Supreme Court* *Civil Appeal No 4744 of 2021* *Sub-Whether Section 10(10(ii) dealing with exemption on account of payment of gratuity where the limit was enhanced from Rs 3.50 lacs to Rs 10 lacs is retrospective or prospective in nature.* The appellant in this case were employees… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that MM Aqua Technologies Limited Vs CIT, Delhi Forum-Supreme Court Date-11th August 2021 Sub-Whether conversion of interest on loan due to financial institutions into debentures amounts to payment of interest and hence deductible u/s 43B notwithstanding the Explanation 3C of the said Section? The Apex court in this case was deciding an important issue regarding deduction… Read More ...
The Surat ITAT Bench has held that The assessing officer disallowed payments of Rs. 57,55,630 made by assessee to the doctor for running the medical shop on the ground that it was in contravention of Code of Medical Ethics Regulation 2002 by attracting Explanation to section 37(1). The stand of the assessee was that payments based on percentage of sales were made… Read More ...
The Calcutta High Court has held that McNally Bharat Engineering Co Ltd and another Vs ACIT Circle 1(1),Kolkata Forum-Calcutta High Court Date-6th August 2021 Sub-Whether refunds determined in pursuance of an assessment order u/s 143(1) can be withheld without passing an speaking order as required by law as per Section 241A read with Section 245- Landmark decision The Single Bench of Calcutta… Read More ...
The Madras High Court(Madurai Bench) has held that Vetrivel Minerals Vs ACIT CC-2,Madurai Forum- Madras High Court Madurai bench Date -3rd August 2021 Sub-Whether assessment orders passed in pursuance of search on the basis of electronic evidences in the form of excel sheet, emails ,WhatsApp chats can be without having regard to Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act and whether cross examination… Read More ...
The Madras High Court has held that Pentamedia Graphics Limited Vs ACIT Media Circle-1 Chennai WP No 28836 & 28837 of 2014 Date-20th July 2021 Forum -Madras High Court Sub- whether the period of limitation u/s 153 for the purpose of passing order u/s 148 in a case where proceedings are stayed by a court are to be counted from the date… Read More ...
The Madras High Court has held that *Vedanta Limited Vs DCIT CompanyCircle 6(2), Chennai *. *WP No 25529 of 2015* *Forum Madras High Court* *Date -15th July2021* *Sub-Whether when the notice u/s 148 is issued in the name of a company which is already merged with another company, Can the apex court decision in the case of Maruti Suzuki be applied or… Read More ...
The Calcutta High Court has held that *Tripura Cricket Association Vs The ACIT & Ors* *Date 26th July 2021* *Forum Calcutta High Court* *WPA No 8480 of 2020 and 8483 of 2020* *Sub-Whether petition u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act,1961 for condonation of delay in filing Form No 10 can be entertained by CBDT beyond the period as prescribed* The appellant in… Read More ...