Disclaimer: This file has been uploaded by a visitor and has not been verified by us for authencity. If you intend to rely on the judgement, you MUST download a copy from the offical website of the respective Courts or Tribunal. Please note that we take no responsibility whatsoever for the contents of the file.

One comment on “B.Kubendran-Vs-DCIT.pdf
  1. CA Subhash Singhal says:

    The notice u/s 143(2) is not only to tax payer intimation about scrt is not correctutiny assessment being under taken against him but also for the officer to assume jurisdiction to frame an order after detailed scrutiny. Unless the jurisdiction is assumed by AO, no valid order can be passed. Consent can not confer jurisdiction on AO rather he has to assume it from law. Such views disturbs the long established judicial views and it is not justified.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*