BHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED (NOW BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED) VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (Supreme Court)

Court: Supreme Court
Head Notes:

The issue is whether Cellular mobile telephone service providers have a liability to deduct tax at source under Section 194-H of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the amount which, as per the Revenue, is a commission payable to an agent by the assessees under the franchise/distributorship agreement between the assessees and the franchisees/distributors. As per the assessees, neither are they paying a commission or brokerage to the franchisees/distributors, nor are the franchisees/distributors their agents. The Supreme Court held that Cellular mobile telephone service providers are not under a legal obligation to deduct tax at source on the income/profit component in the payments received by the distributors/franchisees from the third parties/customers, or while selling/transferring the pre-paid coupons or starter-kits to the distributors. Section 194-H of the Act is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of this case.

Law:
Section(s): 194H
Counsel(s): Various
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By Advocate Mukesh
Date of upload: March 4, 2024

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*