|Court:||Supreme Court of India|
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax , Kanpur Vs AR Polymers Pvt ltd(Supreme Court)
The apex court here was dealing with a case where footwear was being supplied under a contract to paramilitary forces for being supplied onward to the employees of such forces and MRP stickers were being affixed on the footwear only to project the sale as retail sale(which condition was mandatory to avail the benefit of exemption). The Ld Judges relying upon the case of Jayanti Food Processing Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Rajasthan(2007) 8 SCC 34(SC) held that the fixation of the MRP must have been mandated by law and in the present case the institutional sale to paramilitary forces being exempted from such fixation under the legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules,2011, the voluntary fixing of the MRP could not make the respondent eligible to get the exemption on institutional sales and thus allowed the SLP of the department.
Exemption notifications have to be stricter construed is no longer res integra as decided in several consitution bench judgements.
|Section(s):||Section 4(A) of Central Excise Act, 1944|
|Dowload Pdf File||Click here to download the file in pdf format|
|Uploaded By||Adv Ramesh Patodia|
|Date of upload:||March 22, 2023|
Leave a Reply