| Court: | Supreme Court |
| Head Notes: | Condonation of Delay A decision was taken by the Department not to file an appeal against the impugned order of the ITAT. It was only after coming to know that in the case of M/s Vodafone South Limited, the ITAT, Bangalore Bench had given a decision in favour of the Department that as an afterthought it was decided to file an appeal in the instant case. We do not think that the said explanation has any merit in explaining the delay in filing the appeal before the High Court and neither can it be construed to be a sufficient cause for condoning the same. |
| Law: | Income-Tax Act |
| Section(s): | 260A |
| Counsel(s): | For Petitioner(s) Mr. N Venkatraman, A.S.G. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Prashant Singh Ii, Adv. Mr. Annirudh Sharma Ii, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sachit Jolly, Adv. |
| Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
| Uploaded By | Advocate Swati Khandelwal |
| Date of upload: | April 25, 2024 |
Leave a Reply