Court: | Supreme Court |
Head Notes: | Debashis Sinha & Ors Vs RNR Enterprises (Supreme Court) Interesting issues arose in this case when the bunch of flat buyers of housing complex at 1 Kailash Ghosh Road, Kolkata complained to the NCRDC under the Consumer Protection Act regarding non fulfilment of the promises by the builder to provide the promised services as well as not providing the CC and a compensation of Rs 1.80 crores was claimed. The NCRDC even though observing that the builder had adopted a casual approach and guilty of unfair trade practice, suspected that the purpose of complaint was to pressurise the respondent builder so as not to pay for extra services. It was also observed by NCRDC that both the buyer and builder should have ensured that they do not occupy the premises without CC. On these facts the SUpreme Court came down upon heavily on NCRDC for having kept the matter on hold as the judgement was passed almost after 10 months of hearing. Moreover, SC also scolded NCRDC for saying that the buyer ought to know what they were purchasing and the reasoning was found indefensible. Finally as far as CC is concerned, after noting the provisions, it was observed that therefore, evident on a conjoint reading of sections 403, 390, and 394 of the KMC Act that it is the obligation of the person intending to erect a building or to execute works to apply for completion certificate in terms of the rules framed thereunder. It is no part of the flat owner’s duty to apply for a completion certificate. Thus the appeal was allowed remanding the matter to NCRDC to decide the matter afresh. This judgement will be very helpful in dealing with high handedness of the builders. Ramesh Patodia |
Law: | Other Laws |
Section(s): | Consumer Protection Laws and Kolkata Municipal Corporation Laws |
Counsel(s): | Counsels |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | Adv Ramesh Patodia |
Date of upload: | February 10, 2023 |
Leave a Reply