DIVYA CAPITAL ONE PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)

Court: Delhi High Court
Head Notes:

Delhi high court coming down heavily on income tax deptt for passing general /template orders u/s 148A(d) (copy of order marked to cbdt for necessary action)
and inter alia held

SIGNIFICANCE OF ISSUANCE OF A SHOW CAUSE NOTICE AT A STAGE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A REASSESSMENT NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT HAS BEEN LOST ON THE RESPONDENTS.

“16. This Court is of the opinion that significance of issuance of a show cause notice at a stage prior to issuance of a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Act has been lost on the Respondents.

This Court takes judicial notice that in a majority of reassessment cases post 1st April, 2021, the orders under Section 148A(d) of the Act use a template / general reason
to reject the defence of the assessee on merits, namely, “found devoid of any merit because the assessee company has failed to produce the relevant documents in respect of transactions mentioned in show cause notice……..it is established that the assessee has no proper explanation……”

Consequently, this Court is of the opinion that a progressive as well as futuristic scheme of re-assessment whose intent is laudatory has in its implementation not only been rendered nugatory but has also had an unintended opposite result.”

Law:
Section(s): 148,148A,148A(b), 148A(d)
Counsel(s): Mr.Ved Jain, Mr. Nischay Kantoor and Ms. Richa Mishra, Advocates.
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By CA Milind Wadhwani DISA, FAFD(Cert.), CCCA(Cert.),Research (Phd.) Scholar Mob. 9826273333*
Date of upload: May 19, 2022
2 comments on “DIVYA CAPITAL ONE PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court)
  1. KEEN OBSERVER says:

    The above type of things were common in 2006-to 2012 asst years regular assessments and assessee brokers used to reconcile/corelate with 10DB etc and make submissions.After 2012 the AO were not raising such issues.However in above case it seems the exercise started again.
    BE IT MAY THAT BE.
    Now one thing is clear the assessee has to face again 148A/148 and there lies the cache.Erstwhile the matter would have ended and mostly no second batting as reasons recorded UNACCEPTABLE.
    Now if fresh notice issued IN ABOVE CASE is there whether below 50 lakhs concealment would be time barred as is canvassed in SC matter writeup and webinar till AY 2017-18.SAME ANALOGY AY 2018-19 TIME BARRED IF BELOW 50 LAKHS.
    It is being said citing proviso to sec 149 IN EVERY FORUM..

  2. CA Suresh K Kabra says:

    This is done in 99% cases…. RTI can establish this

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*