Manoj Jain v. UOI (Cal.)(HC)

Court: Calcutta High Court
Head Notes:

S. 148 : Reassessment – Notice-Constitutional validity – The delegation authorized being only for the purpose of enlarging limitation under a valid law, such delegation could not be exercised to resurrect the provision of law that stood omitted from the statute book by virtue of its substitution made by the Finance Act, 2021, w.e.f. 01.04.2021 – Reassessment notices issued under section 148 of the Act are quashed-It is left open to the assessing authority to initiate – re-assessment proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021 after making due compliance as required under the law. [S. 147, 148A, 149, 151, 151A, 153, 292 Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA), S. 3(1) of the Act 38 of 2020, Art. 226]

It was held that the Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to the Notifications dated 31st March, 2021 and 27th April, 2021 are declared to be ultra vires the Relaxation Act, 2020 and are therefore bad in law and null and void. All the impugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act are quashed with liberty to the Assessing Officers concerned to initiate fresh re-assessment proceedings in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act as amended by Finance Act, 2021 and after making compliance of the formalities as required by the law.

Followed, Ashok Kumar Agarwal & Ors. v. UOI (All.)(HC), Bpip Infra Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs. ACIT and Ors (Raj (HC); and Mon Mohan Kohli v. ACIT (Delhi) (HC) (WPA No.11950 of 2021 dated January 17, 2022)

Manoj Jain v. UOI (Cal.)(HC)

(Coram : Justice Shri Md. Nizamuddin)

Section(s): 148
Counsel(s): Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Advocate and others
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Date of upload: January 18, 2022

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.