Court: | Supreme Court |
Head Notes: | Where the sale deed requires registration, ownership does not pass until the deed is registered, even if possession is transferred, and consideration is paid without such registration. Public auction cannot be set aside until there is any material irregularity and/or illegality committed in holding the auction or if such auction was vitiated by any fraud or collusion (i) Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, defines a“sale” as the transfer of ownership in exchange for a price that is either paid, promised, or part-paid and part-promised. This provision further describes the manner in which a sale is effected.It stipulates that, in the case of tangible immovable property valued at one hundred rupees or more, the transfer can be made only through a registered instrument. The use of the term “only” signifies that, for tangible immovable property valued at one hundred rupees or more, a sale becomes lawful only when it is executed through a registered instrument. Where the sale deed requires registration, ownership does not pass until the deed is registered, even if possession is transferred, and consideration is paid without such registration. The registration of the sale deed for an immovable property is essential to complete and validate the transfer. Until registration is effected, ownership is not transferred. (ii) In Babasheb Dhondiba Kute vs. Radhu Vithoba Barde in SLP(C) No.29462 OF 2019 it was held that the conveyance by way of sale would take place only at the time of registration of a sale deed in accordance with Section 17 of the Registration Act, 2008. Till then, there is no conveyance in the eyes of law. (iii) It is now a well-settled principle that a sale by way of public auction cannot be set aside until there is any material irregularity and/or illegality committed in holding the auction or if such auction was vitiated by any fraud or collusion. In V.S. Palanivel vs. P. Sriram reported in 2024 INSC 659 held that unless there are some serious flaws in the conduct of the auction as for example perpetration of a fraud/collusion, grave irregularities that go to the root of such an auction, courts must ordinarily refrain from setting them aside keeping in mind the14domino effect such an order would have. (Celir LLP vs. Ms Sumati Prasad Bafna and others Contempt Petition(C) Nos.158-159 of 2024 in Civil Appeal Nos. 5542-5543 of 2023 referred) |
Law: | Other Laws |
Section(s): | Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 17 of the Registration Act, 2008 |
Counsel(s): | Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR Mr. M.K.Goel, Adv. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, AOR Ms. Anshika Agarwal, Adv. |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | Advocate Swati Khandelwal |
Date of upload: | January 9, 2025 |
Leave a Reply