Court: | Supreme Court of India |
Head Notes: | State Bank of India Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Supreme Court) A three judges CJI bench of Supreme-court was dealing with this issue when an employee took LTC reimbursement for the shortest route between two points in India though his travel included foreign destination also like the route like the routeDelhi- Madurai- Columbo- Kuala Lampur- Singapore- Columbo- Delhi. The court after referring to Section 192(1), 201(1), 10(5) of Income-tax Act,1961 and Rule 2B of income-tax rules 1962 noted that it can be seen from the records that many of the employees of the appellants had undertaken travel to Port Blair via Malaysia, Singapore or Port Blair via Bangkok, Malaysia or Rameswaram via Mauritius or Madurai via Dubai, Thailand and Port Blair via Europe etc. It is very difficult to appreciate as to how the appellant who is the assessee-employer could have failed to take into account this aspect. This was the elephant in the room. The moment employees undertake travel with a foreign leg, it is not a travel within India and hence not covered under the provisions of Section 10(5) of the Act. On these facts, the court dismissed the SLP of State bank of India. All those employers who are reimbursing LTC must take into account these aspects while discharging their responsibilities as deductor of TDS Ramesh Patodia |
Law: | Income-Tax Act |
Section(s): | Section 192, 201, 10(5) of Income-tax Act,1961 and Rule2B of Income-tax Rules 1962 |
Counsel(s): | Counsels |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | Ramesh Patodia |
Date of upload: | November 6, 2022 |
Leave a Reply