THE UNION OF INDIA VERSUS BRIJ SYSTEMS LTD (Supreme Court)

Court: Supreme Court
Head Notes:

(i) It appears that on account of mistakes or errors getting noticed on the input tax credit, and the input tax credit being subsequently denied to the purchaser, the Revenue has been taking the stand that rectification is not possible after expiry of the period prescribed under Sections 37(3) and 39(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In order to resolve the issue, we deem it appropriate to issue notice to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

(ii) It may be noticed that, in all these cases, it is accepted by the Revenue that there is a clerical/arithmetical mistake which is not being permitted to be corrected. Invariably, such mistakes come to the notice of the seller, who has to fill up the online form(s), etc., after the input tax credit is denied to the purchaser(s).

(iii) We appoint Mr. Arvind P. Datar, learned Senior Advocate, as an Amicus Curiae to assist this Court in the present case.

Law:
Section(s): Sections 37(3) and 39(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Counsel(s): Raghavendra P Shankar, A.S.G
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By Advocate Swati Khandelwal
Date of upload: March 26, 2025

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*