Court: | Supreme Court of India |
Head Notes: | Union of India and another Vs Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP & Anr (Supreme Court) The provisions of Section 140(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 dealing with *Removal, Resignation of Auditor and Giving of Special Notice* appears in Chapter X of the Act which deals with *Audit and Auditors*. Also Section 143(12) provides that in the event an auditor has reason to believe that an offence or fraud is being or has been committed in a company then the auditor has to report this to central government. Moreover Section 144 provides that an auditor cannot provide management services to the company. Section 140(5) has to be thus interpreted in the light of these provisions. As per first proviso to Section 140(5), NCLT as a preliminary measure, has the power to order change of auditor on an application made by the Central Government and further if upon final enquiry it is found so, NCLT can order that such Auditor shall not act as auditor of any company for five years. This judgement highlights the need for independence of auditors and to act proactively in case of need. Ramesh Patodia |
Law: | Other Laws |
Section(s): | Section 140, 241 of the Companies Act 2013 |
Counsel(s): | Counsels |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | Adv Ramesh Patodia |
Date of upload: | May 4, 2023 |
Good judgement by SC. The Auditor in default can not escape from accountability and responsibility.