sir, the finding of the high court is contradictory, one side it held that the imposition of the penalty is discretionary and also it says that reopening of the 158BC/BD assessment is not permissible. please comment.
- Welcome to itatonline.org Forum.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages1
#2
Discussion / Re: disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) penalty for concealment
May 03, 2012, 12:11:17 PMQuote from: jindalrk on May 02, 2012, 08:17:19 PM
there was addition u/s 40(a)(ia) now AO desires to impose concealment penalty. pl. guide on this point. as i have to reply to ao.
CA RKJINDAL
#3
Discussion / disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) penalty for concealment
May 02, 2012, 08:17:19 PM
there was addition u/s 40(a)(ia) now AO desires to impose concealment penalty. pl. guide on this point. as i have to reply to ao.
CA RKJINDAL
CA RKJINDAL
Pages1