CPS system .We will not be able to answer . (read more)

.Please write to the Author for clarification (read more)

When the lease is in name of A, how B can directly pay royalty to Government is not clear. It appears that the royalty may have been paid in name of A. Therefore, the basic liability of RCM falls upon A. It appears that B has also not paid RCM. You can ascertain above fact… (read more)

It is a well settled position in law that daughters have the same rights as sons in HUF property. Therefore, the daughter out of the second marriage will have the same rights as children from the first marriage with respect to the properties of the HUF. Furthermore, since all the members of the HUF are… (read more)

Depends on facts . Burden is on the assesseee to prove that there was no concealment . It is desirable to file a detail submission on facts to demonstrate that the claim is bonafide . In Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2012) 348 ITR 306/253 CTR 1/77 DTR 153/211 Taxman 40 (SC) the… (read more)

Merely because a notice issued under section 131(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not reflected on the portal does not mean the same is not genuine. As long as it contains a valid DIN, it should be presumed as genuine and should be addressed. (read more)

It is a well settled position in law that daughters have the same rights as sons in HUF property. Therefore, the daughter out of the second marriage will have the same rights as children from the first marriage with respect to the properties of the HUF. In the case of HARILAL AMBALAL (HUF) v ITO… (read more)

Yes, section 43CA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) will be attracted in the hands of the Partnership Firm. The Stamp Duty Value of the property will be taken as the Sales price. Similarly, the difference between the Stamp Duty Value and Price paid by the partner will attract section 56(2)(x) of the Act in… (read more)

The assessee should file an appeal before the CIT(A) and can also file rectification application . (read more)