Answers to queries on legal issues
Tax notice after re-development of Flat | |
---|---|
Subject: | Tax notice after re-development of Flat |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Anshi |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | Notice, Re development, redevelopment |
Date: | August 19, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The transaction is an exchange and hence a "transfer" as per section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act). The assessee gets deduction under section 54 of the Act and thus there is no tax liability. If the assessee has transferred tenancy rights or a commercial property, he may not get deduction under section 54… (read more)
|
CPC System – Is there not a deficiency in the System in applying / auto calculation of tax chargeable under the old and new tax regime !? | |
---|---|
Subject: | CPC System – Is there not a deficiency in the System in applying / auto calculation of tax chargeable under the old and new tax regime !? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | vswaminathan |
Answered by: | Research Team |
Tags: | CPC system, Processing of Tax Return by CPC |
Date: | August 19, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The queriest may have to write to CBDT and get the clarification . Answer has been given to the best of ability and understanding (read more)
|
SERVICE TAX MANDATORY DEPOSIT FOR FILING APPEAL | |
---|---|
Subject: | SERVICE TAX MANDATORY DEPOSIT FOR FILING APPEAL |
Category: | GST |
Asked by: | KARAN SHAH |
Answered by: | Advocate C.B.Thakar |
Tags: | appeal, dissolution of firm, GST, service tax |
Date: | August 18, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
This query is about administrative procedure. In my opinion paying pre-payment from partner account is correct as firm is not operative. In appeal or subsequently a letter should be written informing authority that since the firm is dissolved the amount of part-payment is made on partner’s account bearing no. ________. Further, it should be clarified… (read more)
|
Notice u/s 148A(b), Limitation period | |
---|---|
Subject: | Notice u/s 148A(b), Limitation period |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | B R Bhandari |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | Limitation, Reassessment |
Date: | August 18, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Your understanding is not incorrect. However, there is no judicial precedent to buttress your contention. The argument will be tested before the Courts in the next few years. (read more)
|
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged noncompliance of notices u/s 142(1) in assessment u/ s 147 r.w.144 and 144B | |
---|---|
Subject: | Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged noncompliance of notices u/s 142(1) in assessment u/ s 147 r.w.144 and 144B |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | H S Kumbhat |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | Concealment penalty, noncompliance of notice, penalty |
Date: | August 17, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) is Rs. 10,000/-. As per section 273B of the Act, no penalty can be levied under section 271(1)(b) of the Act, where the assessee proves that there is a reasonable cause for such failure. Therefore, the onus is on the assessee to establish that there… (read more)
|
Registration of HUF dissolution deed | |
---|---|
Subject: | Registration of HUF dissolution deed |
Category: | General Law, Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Vidhan |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | HUF, Income derived from HUF, registration |
Date: | August 17, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
As per section 17 of the Registration Act, the registration has to be done in the district office where the property is situated. Certain State stamp laws have the requirement of stamping an instrument executed outside the state, within 3 months of it being brought within the state. Therefore, it would be imperative to check… (read more)
|
Cash Deposit in Saving Bank A/c. Addition u/s 68 of IT Act | |
---|---|
Subject: | Cash Deposit in Saving Bank A/c. Addition u/s 68 of IT Act |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | KANIKA AGRAWAL |
Answered by: | Research Team |
Tags: | cash credits, cash deposited in Bank, Section 68, Unexplained cash credit |
Date: | August 16, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The assessee may have to explain the reasons for not attending before the Assessing Officer . If required the assessee may have to file an affidavit in support of the reasons . The assessee may have to file additional evidence before the CIT(A) by making an application under Rule 46A of the Act . The… (read more)
|
Notice u/s 148A(b) | |
---|---|
Subject: | Notice u/s 148A(b) |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | B R Bhandari |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | Notice, Reassessment, search, search assessment |
Date: | August 16, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
1. The subsequent notice is valid. The First reassessment order will be set aside and the appeal before CIT(A) is infructuous. 2. The AO has to provide all the information. The assessee should raise this point during the assessment proceedings. 3. The Assessee has to file the return of income and participate in the reassessment… (read more)
|
CPC System – Is there not a deficiency in the System in applying / auto calculation of tax chargeable under the old and new tax regime!? | |
---|---|
Subject: | CPC System – Is there not a deficiency in the System in applying / auto calculation of tax chargeable under the old and new tax regime!? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | vswaminathan |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | CPC system, Processing of Tax Return by CPC |
Date: | August 14, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The new tax regime does not automatically apply to any assessee. Once the new regime is selected the assessee cannot go back to the old regime. Further, it is very much possible that the tax liability could be less in the old regime vis-a-vis the new regime, especially when the assessee is claiming deductions under… (read more)
|
APPEALATTE | |
---|---|
Subject: | APPEALATTE |
Category: | g, General Law |
Asked by: | Lance Armstrong Costello |
Answered by: | Research Team |
Tags: | not argued |
Date: | August 13, 2022 |
Excerpt of answer: |
: Not argued means the contention is not raised at the time of hearing before the competent Authority . Normally the Appellate Forum will not entertain a arguments on facts if it is not argued before the lower Authorities, however if it is pure question of law the Competent court is bound to entertain .… (read more)
|