Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Amey Pravinbhai Brahmbhatt v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 17 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 271A: Penalty – Failure to keep maintain -Retain books of accounts –Documents -Penalty order is set aside. [S.44AA]

Gunwant Sohanlal Kherodiya v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 31(SN) (Mum)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty- Concealment – Deeming provision –Capital gains -Agreement value -Stamp valuation- Levy of penalty is not valid. [S.50C]

S. Sagar Enterprises v. DCIT [2024]205 ITD 110/109 ITR 650 (Mum) (Trib)

S.271(1)(c): Penalty -Concealment -Not striking off irrelevant portion in the notice – Penalty order is quashed. [S. 69C, 143(3)]

Dilip Kothari v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 654 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner -Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Document identification No (DIN)- Order is bad in law. [S. 153C]

Sarita Gupta (Ms.) v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 373 / 204 ITD 299 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Capital gains -Profit on sale of property used for residence -Capital gains not deposited in CGAS -Capital gain was invested in purchase/construction of residential house within time limit prescribed under section 54(1) –Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 139(1)]

Bijni Dooars Tea Co. Ltd. v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 105/ 204 ITD 75/ 228 TTJ 552 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 263: Commissioner -Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Long term capital gains- [S. 45, 115O, 115P]

Kaustubh Gupta v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 10(SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Revision on the basis of investigation/ enquiries conducted post completion of assessment -Sale of shares -Long term capital gains – Reassessment order is invalid. [S. 143(3)]

Ajay Sharma v. Jt. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 268 (Amritsra)(Trib)

S. 251: Appeal -Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers- Co-terminus -Fresh claim of deduction- Allowed deduction. [S.80C]

DSI-Bridgecon India (P.) ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 205 ITD 136 (Delhi) (Trib)

S.251: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers -No power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution –CIT(A) is directed to pass speaking order on merits. [S. 92C, 92CA(2)]

Dy. CIT v. Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 689 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay -DTAA -India -UAE.[S. 9(1)(vi), 201(1), 201(IA), Art. 7]