Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dadha Pharma LLP v. Dy.CIT ( Mad)( HC) www.itatonline.org .

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Central Circle – Notice issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO ) rather than the Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO)- Notice and consequential order under section 148A(d) is quashed and set aside – Liberty is granted to the Revenue to seek revival if the Supreme Court later reverses the decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd . [ S. 148 , 148A(b), 148A(d) , 151A Art , 226 ]

PCIT v. Pacific Organics Pvt. Ltd., (Bom) (HC)www.itatonline.org

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Notice must specify the charge – Notice must be precise and there should be no room for ambiguity – Veena Estate (P.) Ltd v. CIT [2024] 158 taxmann.com 341/ 461 ITR 483 (Bom)( HC) , distinguished- Order of Tribunal is affirmed .[ S. 260A ]

Subhash Chander Oberoi v. ACIT( Mum)( Trib)www.itatonline.org Subhash Chander Oberoi v. ACIT( Mum)( Trib)www.itatonline.org

S. 2(22)(e): Deemed Dividend – Advance received from closely held company by its shareholder – Holding more than 10% -Commercial transaction – Not assessable as deemed dividend .

AKM Resorts. v. ACIT (2025) 211 ITD 633 (Chd) (Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Estimate of income-Estimation of rate of NP on gross receipts-Rejection of books of account-Penalty is deleted.[S. 145]

Make My Trip (India) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (IT) (2025) 211 ITD 389 / 234 TTJ 153(UR) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Reimbursement of expenditure on account of Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) costs incurred by holding company-Allowable as deduction-Revision order is quashed.[S. 37(1)]

Diebold Nixdorf India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 211 ITD 377 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional claim-Not made through revised return of income-Restrictions does not apply to appellate authorities. [S. 139]

Karam Chand Sweets. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 190 (Chd) (Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Survey-Surrender of income-No effective disposal of appeal-Matter remanded to the file of the CIT(A).[S. 69 to 69D, 115BBE, 133A]

Kushal Narayan Patel. v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 36 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Seized cash-Adjustment-Notice of demand dated 30-12-2016-Cash adjusted on 21-3-2018-Cash seized was available with the Department-Interest cannot be charged. [S. 132B]

Accounts Officer, BSNL v. DCIT TDS) (2025) 211 ITD 449 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Short deduction of tax deducted at source-Assessing Officer is directed to look into contention of assessee with regard to incorrect levy of interest under section 201(1A).[S. 194C, 194J, 201(IA)]

Xander Finance (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 211 ITD 595 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Not reflected in Form 26AS-Submitted supporting documents-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for proper verification.[S. 143(1), 154, 201, Form 26AS.]