Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Chandhok Cold Storage (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 204 ITD 17 / 227 TTJ 744 (SMC)) (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Fair market value-Unquoted equity shares-Valuation date-Value as on date on which assessee company receives property or consideration-Matter remanded. [S. 56(2)(viib), R. 11UA]

Anjali Bhadoo. (Smt.) v. ITO (2024) 204 ITD 124 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Sale of immoveable property-Purchase of residential unit/ flat from a builder-Payment by instalments-Possession of flat was received within 3 years from sale of property-Agreement for sale of flat by builder is construed as agreement of construction-Possession is construed as completion of construction-Entitle to exemption. [S. 45]

Arun Tulshidas Kharat. v. DCIT (2024) 204 ITD 618 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Long term capital gains-Indexation-Cost of improvement-Failure to file necessary documents-Disallowance is affirmed.[S. 45]

Arunima Adcon Services (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 204 ITD 146 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Business income-Converted its stock-in-trade of shares into investment in shares-Profits arising from sale of such investment was to be taxed as capital gains, long-term or short-term and not as business income.[S. 28(i)]

DCIT v. Hero Investment (P.) Ltd. (2024) 204 ITD 29 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Business income-Shares shown as investment in balance sheet and not as stock in trade-Period of holdings ranging from 3301 to 1352 days-Income from sale of securities is assessable as capital gains and not as business income.[S. 28(i)]

DCIT v. Adani Mining (P.) Ltd. (2024) 204 ITD 269 (Ahd)(Trib.)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Outstanding more than three years-Addition cannot be made-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed.

Taj TV Ltd. v. DCIT IT (2024) 204 ITD 50 (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalty-Fes for technical services-Transponder fee and uplinking charges-Payment was not made for right to use any industrial, commercial or scientific equipment-Payment would not fall within ambit of royalty-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-USA [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), Art. 12]

DCIT v. Adani Mining (P.) Ltd. (2024) 204 ITD 269 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Land development expenditure is allowable as revenue expenditure.

ACIT v. Chittorgarh Kota Tollway (P.) Ltd. (2024) 204 ITD 223 (Ahd)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Penalty-Prior period expenses-Crystallized in year under consideration-Breach of contract-Can not be equated with offence, or something prohibited by law-Entitle to deduction. [Explanation to section 37, S. 145]

PNP Maritime Services (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024)204 ITD 810 /231 TTJ 31 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free advances-Sufficient funds-No disallowance can be made.