Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Foods and Inns Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 215 ITD 266 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Business profits-Canvassing orders and facilitating export transactions-Business income accruing outside India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-No disallowance can be made.[S.9(1)(i), 195, Article 7 of the OECD Model Convention]

R Y Midas Metacast (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 305 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Commission-Allowable as deduction.

DCIT v. Anand NVH Products (P.) Ltd. (2025) 215 ITD 98 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Marketing support expenses-Director’s remuneration-Allowable as business expenditure.

Atamjeet Singh Sandhu. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 181 (Chd) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(va): Any sum received from employees-Delayed employees’ PF/ESI contributions on ground that figures in Form 3CD included both employer’s and employees’ portions-Matter was remanded to the file of CIT(A) to verify actual delay, segregate employer’s and employees’ contributions, and restrict disallowance only to employees’ share deposited after statutory due dates.[S.43B, 143(1)]

Milestone Merchandise P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 122 ITR 186 (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Advances to group concerns at lower interest-No disallowance if assessee’s own funds exceed interest-free advances-Nexus established between borrowings and business use-Ad hoc disallowance based on average rate unjustified-Addition is deleted. [S. 40A(2)(b)]

Ravindra Madanlal Khandelwal v. Dy. CIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 457/ (2025) 123 ITR 660/ 234 TTJ 57(UO) (Nagpur)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Commercial expediency-Disallowance is deleted.[S.37(1)]

Khandelwal Industries. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 667 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Addition was based on mere guesswork and surmises, and the same was deleted.

Kausalya Agro Farms and Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 401 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Commercial expediency-Interest allowed in earlier year-The principle of commercial expediency applied mutatis mutandis to the corresponding portion, and such disallowance was not warranted.[S. 251]

Raman and Weil (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 215 ITD 514 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 35AC: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes-Donations-Had valid approval at the time of payment-Information from Investigation wing-No evidence that donation was bogus or returned cash-Subsequent withdrawal of approval or cancellation of registration under section 12AA(3) could not justify disallowance of deduction under section 35AC of the Act. [S.12AA(3), 35AC(6), 131, 132, 143(3),147, 148]

Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 234 TTJ 372/ 172 taxmann.com 42 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 35 : Expenditure on scientific research-Business expenditure on in-house R&D facility-Claimed weighted deducted-AO denied as Form 3CL was missing-Held, post amendment, Form 3CL is a requisite for claiming deduction under S. 35(2AB)-Not entitled to deduction. [S.35(2AB]