Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


AECOM Intercontinental Holdings UK Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 503 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 197: Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Binding precedent-High Court in the previous year directed for issuance of nil-rate deduction certificate to Assessee-Rejection of application made by the Assessee for issuance of nil-rate deduction for the year under consideration on the ground that the decision of the High Court has been challenged in SLP is unjustified. [S.9(1)(i), Art. 226]

Nord Anglia Education Ltd. v. Dy. CIT, IT (2026) 309 Taxman 208 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 197: Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Payment to Non-resident-Withholding Certificate-Rejection of a Nil Withholding Certificate is unsustainable where the AO fails to consider the statutory factors under section 197 before determining the withholding tax liability-Matter remanded-DTAA-India-UK.[S. 195, Rule 28AA, Art. 13, Art. 226]

Swagat Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 152 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Time limit-Interim relief leaving only eleven days of limitation-Limitation extendable only by sixty days under the proviso to the Explanation to section 153-Twelve-month period under section 153(6)(i) inapplicable to search assessments-Assessment beyond extended limitation quashed. [S. 132, 153, 153B, 153(6)(i)]

ACIT v. Anuj Sharma (2026) 309 Taxman 85 (SC) Editorial: Anuj Sharma v .ACIT(2025) 181 taxmann.com 746 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Satisfaction note based on incriminating material found during the course of search for other years-Notice issued for year under consideration under section 153C of the Act in the absence of any reason that incriminating material of other years will impact the taxability of assessment year is bad in law-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay of 448 days and 474 days. [Art. 136]

PCIT v. I.B.C. Knowledge Park (P)Ltd [2026] 309 Taxman 87 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd (2025) 181 taxmann.com 747 (Karn)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-No incriminating material was found-SLP of revenue dismissed.[Art. 136]

ACIT v. Gopal Prasad Gupta (2026) 309 Taxman 329 (SC) Editorial: Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. ACIT (2024) 161 taxmann.com 255 (Raj)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Incriminating material belonging to or relating to a person other than the searched person is found during search proceedings-AO is required to proceed under section 153C and not under section 148-SLP of the revenue dismissed on account of delay of 56 days and also on merits. [S. 148, Art, 136]

ITO v. Mangla Gupta (2026) 309 Taxman 171 (SC) Editorial: Twylight Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 158 taxmann.com 378 / 463 ITR 702 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 151 : Sanction for issue of notice-Reassessment proceedings are initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year; prior sanction must be obtained from the specified authority under section 151(ii); sanction by any other authority is without jurisdiction and renders the reassessment proceedings invalid; SLP of the Revenue dismissed. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 151(ii), Art. 136]

Pawan Sachdeva v. ITO (2026) 309 Taxman 451 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Period of limitation-Issuance of notice under section 148 within the limitation period is sufficient; inadvertent attachment errors or delayed viewing of the e-mail are curable defects and do not invalidate reassessment. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]

ACIT v. Avinash Kumar (2026) 309 Taxman 167 (SC) Editorial: Avinash Kumar v. ACIT (2026) 182 taxmann.com 320 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice under section 148 issued beyond the period of 6 years from the end of the relevant assessment year 2014-15 is barred by limitation-SLP of the revenue dismissed.[S. 148, Art. 136]

CCIT v. Sheetal International (P.) Ltd. (2026) 309 Taxman 168 (SC) Editorial: Sheetal International (P.) Ltd v. CCIT (2025) 302 Taxman 271 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice under section 148 issued beyond the period of limitation prescribed under the first proviso to section 149(1) of the Act is barred by limitation and liable to be quashed-SLP of revenue delayed by 320 days-SLP dismissed on account of delay. [S. 148, Art. 136]