Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ashwini Kumar v. CBDT (2025) 307 Taxman 623 (P& H(HC)

S. 139: Return of income-Due date for filing tax audit report-CBDT was directed to issue a circular extending the return filing due date to 30-11-2025, for Assessment year 2025-26 [S. 44AB, 119 Art. 226]

Institute of Actuaries of India v. CIT (E) (2025) 307 Taxman 256 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Form No 10BB-Delay of 81 days-Chartered Accountant failed to prompt or instruct authorized person from the assessee institute to verify the audit report on the e-filing portal before the due date of filing of return-Delay was condoned. [S.10(23C)(vi), 11, 119(2)(b), 143(1), Form No 10BB, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Toyota Tsusho India (P.) Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 135 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Cannot be treated as a wholesale trader-Tolerance limit of ±3 per cent is applicable.[S. 260A]

PCIT v. FIS Global Business Solutions India (P.) Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 309 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)-Cost plus pricing methodology-Advance Pricing Agreement would be persuasive value.[S.92CC]

Pr. CIT v. Casio India Company (P.) Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 122 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Order of the Tribunal deleting the adjustment is affirmed. [S. 260A]

Nestle Sa v. Assessing Officer (IT), New Delhi (2025) 307 Taxman 167 (SC) Editorial: Nestle SA v. AO (IT) (2024) 300 Taxman 361/ 341 CTR 320/ 243 DTR 88 (SC)

S. 90 : Double taxation relief-elimination of double taxation-Review petition dismissed against order of the Supreme Court that a notification under section 90(1) is a mandatory condition to give effect to a DTAA, or any protocol changing its terms or conditions, which has the effect of altering existing provisions of law-DTAA-India-France-curative petition dismissed. [ITATR. 128, Art. 10, 13]

PCIT v. Improve Financial Consultants (P.) Ltd. (2025) 307 Taxman 260 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Investment at end of year-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal is affirmed by the High Court. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. Hamlet (2025) 307 Taxman 248 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 68: Cash credits-Sale of shares-Short-term capital loss-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 260A]

Mukesh Gupta v. Dy. CIT (2025) 307 Taxman 632 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Company-Advance-Interest-Failure to prove nexus-Order of Tribunal affirming the disallowance is affirmed. [S. 15, 260A]

Mukesh Gupta v. Dy. CIT (2025) 307 Taxman 632 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 15: : Salaries-Business income-Director-Professional fees-Failure to furnish documentary evidence-Assessable as income from salary-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.17, 28(i), 194J, 260A]