Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Anuradha A. Karnik. v. TRO (2025) 481 ITR 428/175 taxmann.com 841 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : Anuradha A. Karnik. v. TRO (2025) 481 ITR 431/305 Taxman 627 (SC), SLP dismissed.

S. 179 : Private company-Liability of directors-Recovery of tax-Petition for stay of proclamation and sale of assessee’s property-Assessee not challenging order holding her jointly and severally liable with company, nor attachment order-Assessee not impleading company-None of foundational orders challenged-Assessee or company unwilling to pay taxes, though demands attained finality-No severe financial hardship pleaded-Balance of convenience not favouring grant of an unconditional stay-Direction to deposit 50 per cent. of demand within eight weeks as condition for stay.[Art. 226]

Mange Ram Mittal v. CIT (2025) 481 ITR 12 /307 Taxman 613 (SC) Editorial : Manage Ram Mittal v. CIT (2024) 168 taxmann.com 306/ (2025) 482 ITR 130 (P& H)(HC)

S. 158BC : Block assessment-Undisclosed income-Benami companies-High Court holding findings of fact if not perverse cannot be interfered with in appeal-SLP dismissed. [S. 132, 158BB, 260A, Art. 136]

FinDoc Finvest (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT, Central (2025) 481 ITR 58 /304 Taxman 491 (P&H)(HC)

S. 153: Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Assessment order uploaded on portal after expiry of limitation period-Order time-barred-Violation of natural justice-Notices issued to wrong email ID despite intimation of fresh email IDs-No effective opportunity of personal hearing-Assessment order passed under influence of superior officers and without independent application of mind-Order quashed as non est.
[S. 143(3), 142(1), 119, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Pavitra Realcon (P.) Ltd [2024] 164 taxmann.com 1169 / (2025) 481 ITR 663 (Delhi) (HC) PCIT v Design Infracon Pvt Ltd [2024] 164 taxmann.com 1169 (2025) 481 ITR 663 (Delhi) (HC) PCIT v. Delegate Realtors Pvt Ltd [2024] 164 taxmann.com 1169 / (2025) 481 ITR 663 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-No incriminating material found in search of non-searched persons-Statement under section 132(4) alone, without corroborative material, insufficient basis for addition-Assessment proceedings vitiated. [S. 132, 153A, 153C, 292B]

TVS Credit Services Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 481 ITR 574/ 174 taxmann.com 1078 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Jurisdiction lies with Faceless Assessment Officer or Jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Contrary views in precedents-Decision in Mark Studio India Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO1 dissented from Matter referred to Division or larger Bench.[S. 144B, 147, 148, 148A, 151A, Art. 226]

Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd v. ACIT (2025) 481 ITR 556/ 175 taxmann.com 800 (Telengana)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Face less assessment-Mandatory-Notices and orders issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Invalid–Notification No.18 of 2022 dated 29-3-20221. [S. 144B, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151A, Art. 226]

Prameela Pasumarthi(Smt) v.Dy. CIT (2025) 481 ITR 336/ 180 taxmann.com 131 (AP)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Jurisdiction of Income-tax authorities Faceless procedure-Mandatory-Notices and orders issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Invalid [S. 144B, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 151A, Art. 226]

Ramadoss Srikanthi v. ACIT (2025) 481 ITR 126 / 174 taxmann.com 150 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice dated 31-3-2021 under section 148 was issued within extended limitation period under section 149(1)(b) as it stood till 31-3-2021-Notice is not time barred even after application of first proviso to section 149 as amended with effect from 1-4-2021. [S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Nisha Garg v.UOI (2025) 481 ITR 257 (P&H)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Directions of Supreme Court in UOU v. Ashish Agarwal without following amended law-Bar of limitation-Dicta laid down by Supreme Court in UOI v. Rajeev Bansal-Notices and order barred by limitation.[S. 142(1), 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 226].

Prakash Pandurang Patil v. ITO (2025) 481 ITR 325/ 177 taxmann.com 552 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : ITO v. Prakash Pandurang Patil (2025) 481 ITR 332 / 306 Taxman 341 (SC) SLP of revenue was dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits.

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless regime-Jurisdiction of JAO-Notice after three years-Sanction of Specified Authority-Approval to be obtained from Principal Chief Commissioner-Approval from Principal Commissioner-Sanction is invalid-Order and consequent notice is invalid S. 148. [S. 147, 148A(b) 148A(d) 151(i), 151(ii) 151A, Art. 226]