Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ashitkumar Satishchandra Patel v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 538 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice dated 30-8-2022 issued under section 148 being issued beyond ‘surviving time’ and hence invalid.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226, Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA).]

UOI v. Krishna Fashion World (2025) 307 Taxman 7 (SC) Editorial: Virendra Ship Recyclers LLP v. ACIT (2025) 170 taxmann.com 588 (Bom)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Order of the High Court was affirmed-SLP of the revenue was dismissed as time-barred. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3, Art. 136]

ITO v. Dhara Varun Shah (2025) 307 Taxman 11 (SC) Editorial: Dhara Varun Shah v. ITO [2023] 151 taxmann.com 558 (Guj)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-SLP delay of 800 and 467 days-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay.[S. 148,148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 136]

ITO v. Medwin Hospital Services (2025) 307 Taxman 9 (SC) Editorial: Kalyan Chillara v. DY.CIT [2024] 167 taxmann.com 500 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-last date for service of notice and initiating proceedings under section 148 under unamended provisions was coming to an end on 31-3-2021, but notices had been issued from the office of the Department either on 1-4-2021-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 148, Art. 136]

Mallesh Goud Donkeni v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 190 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Notice and order were quashed and set aside. [S. 144B, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151A, Art. 226.]

PCCIT v. Komarla Yogendra Keertana (Smt) (2025) 307 Taxman 106 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Time limit-Minimum of seven days to respond-Order of single judge quashing the order was affirmed. [S. 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Vincent Commercial Company Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 320 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice issued at old address-Notice was issued by jurisdictional assessing Officer and not Faceless Assessing Officer-Notice and order quashed and set aside. [S. 144B, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Laxmanbhai Amarsingh Chavda v. AUD(2025) 307 Taxman 30 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash deposited in bank-Failure to consider the reply-Principle of natural justice-Order of assessment was quashed and set aside. [S.144B, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Atul Mahavirprasad Paldecha v. ITO (2025) 307 Taxman 331 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained money-Allowed only four days to respond notice-Order passed under section 148A(d) as well as notice issued under section 148 were quashed and set-aside. [S. 69A, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Mehul Ravjibhai Surani v. AUID(2025) 307 Taxman 202 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained investments-Failure to consider the reply-Natural justice-Order and notice set aside-Matter remanded.[S. 69, 115BBE, 147,148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art.226]