Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Arun Kumar Gupta v. Asst. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 186 (Surat)(Trib.).

S. 251: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers-Duty to adjudicate jurisdictional grounds -Matter remanded where legal grounds not decided before setting aside assessment. [S. 144, 147, 148, 250, 254]

Geethika Enterprises v. ITO (2025) 128 ITR 556 (Hyd.)(Trib.).

S. 249: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Condonation of delay -Ex parte assessment -Matter remanded for fresh adjudication. [S. 143(3), 221(1), 271(1)(c)]

Navratan Management P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 100 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical approval-Multiple approval on other group cases -Non-application of mind -Order was quashed. [S. 132, 153A]

Sai Chandra Construction Co. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 493 (Delhi)(Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Undisclosed contract receipts -Estimation of profit at 8% upheld-Addition was deleted. [S. 44AD, 132(1)]

Pushpanjali Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 201 (Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment of person other than searched person -Satisfaction note -Addition on basis of unacted seized agreement -Invalid approval under section 153D -Entire assessment quashed. [S. 69C, 132, 143(3), 153D]

Anjana Construction v. ACIT (2025) 128 ITR 148 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person -Search-A satisfaction note is required to be recorded under section 153C for each assessment year-A consolidated satisfaction note recorded for different assessment years would vitiate entire assessment proceedings [S. 132, 153A]

ITO v. Taj Land Developers and Promoters (P.) Ltd. (2025) 128 ITR 167 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 147: Reassessment -“Reason to believe” -Reopening invalid where reasons recorded are factually incorrect and based on non-application of mind-Assessment was quashed. [S. 148, 151]

Rajesh Kumar Bansal v. ITO (2025) 128 ITR 123 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 147: Reassessment -Addition cannot be made on issues unconnected with reasons recorded for reopening. Addition was deleted. [S. 148]

Argos Holdings Pte. Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 128 ITR 582 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment -Additional ground-Reassessment proceedings initiated solely on the basis of NMS, without any independent verification, tangible material, or proper satisfaction recorded by the AO, would not confer valid jurisdiction under section 147-Initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147 was void ab initio. [S. 115A, 139, 148, 194LD, 254(1)]

Bhupesh Gupta v. ACIT (2025) 128 ITR 317 (Chd)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Validity of addition on new issue -Assessment reopened for escapement of salary income, but addition made on account of Recurring Deposit Investment -Addition was deleted. [S. 148]