Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sree Metaliks Ltd. v. UOI (2026) 486 ITR 207 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment–Recovery of tax-Insolvency resolution Resolution plan-Department bound by resolution plan and barred from enforcing extinguished claim Demand raised beyond plan period void Plan approved by adjudicating authority binding on all stakeholders including Central and State Governments and local authorities Claims not forming part of plan extinguished No creditor including tax authorities entitled to assert claim outside approved plan-Assessment order and demand notice for pre-corporate insolvency resolution process period unenforceable after approval of resolution plan-Alternative remedy-Writ maintainable notwithstanding availability of statutory appeal-[S. 156, 226,246A, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, 31(1), 238, Art. 226, Order XLVII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.]

Deepak Pragjibhai Gondaliya v. Pr. CIT [2025] 175 taxmann.com 985 /[2026] 486 ITR 458 ((Guj)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Double taxation relief-Tax credit claim for salary earned Bangladesh-Form filed belatedly-Term genuine hardship to be interpreted liberally-Matter remanded. [S.90, 119(2)(b), 143(1), Form No.67, R. 128, Art. 226]

Manav Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Seva Sanstha v. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 427 / 185 taxmann.com 576 ((Bom)(Nag)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT v. Manav Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Seva Sanstha [2026] 486 ITR 429/ 185 taxmann.com 910 (SC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Charitable purpose: Delay of 687 days in filing audit report in Form No. 10B-Oversight by Chartered Accountant-Considering the nature of work done by the assessee, the delay in filing the audit report was condoned-Cost imposed of Rs.10,000. [S.11, 119(b) Form 10B, Art. 226]

CIT v. Manav Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Seva Sanstha [2026] 486 ITR 429/ 185 taxmann.com 910 (SC) Editorial :Manav Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Seva Sanstha v. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 427 / 185 taxmann.com 576 ((Bom)(Nag)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Charitable purpose: Delay of 687 days in filing audit report in Form No. 10B-Oversight by Chartered Accountant-Considering the nature of work done by the assessee, the delay in filing the audit report was condoned-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S.11, 119(b) Form 10B, Art. 226]

MRF Ltd. v. CBDT (2025)172 taxmann.com 776 / (2026) 486 ITR 81 (Mad)(HC)

S. 115BAA: Tax on income of certain domestic companies. Concessional tax regime -Delay in filing Form 10IC-Order of rejection set aside-Department directed to keep portal open to enable assessee to upload Form 10-IC and directed the assessee to file Form 10-IC within four weeks and the Department to deal with the claim of the assessee under section 115BAA on merits and in accordance with law. [S.119(2)(b), Art. 226]

Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT [2025] 181 taxmann.com 301 / (2026) 486 ITR 476 / 348 CTR 268 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP granted; referred to larger Bench, JCIT v. Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd. (2026) 186 taxmann.com 774 (SC)

S. 90: Double taxation relief-Tax-Double taxation relief-Dividend distribution tax (DDT) levied under section 115-O held to be a ‘tax’ on dividend income of shareholders, though collected from distributing company for administrative convenience-Beneficial DTAA rate overrides domestic levy under section 115-O-Levy of DDT in excess of 10% held contrary to India-UK DTAA-Interpretation-Board for Advance Rulings-Gross tax rate in appropriate manner-DTAA-India-UK [S. 2(22), S. 2(24),2(43), S.4, S.90(2), S.115-O, 245Q, 245R, 245W, Art. 1, 2, 11].

CIT v. Patel Engg. Ltd. [2026] 486 ITR 538 /310 Taxman 408 (Bom)(HC)

S. 80IA: Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Developer-Contractor-Works contract-Engaged in activity of construction of two projects and it had borne and undertaken all development risks, geological risks and investment risks; assessee was a developer of projects and not merely a works contractor and, thus, would be eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4)-Order of Tribunal affirmed.-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Provision should be read rationally -[S.80IA(4), 260A]

Pr. CIT v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd. [2025] 180 taxmann.com 502 /[2026] 486 ITR 88 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Source of source need not be proved-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition was affirmed. [S.260A]

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 598 / 185 taxmann.com 647 (Guj)(HC)

S. 55: Capital gains-Cost of improvement-Cost of acquisition-Income-Capital or revenue receipt-Compensation from transfer of self-generated trademarks, goodwill, marketing rights and know-how before insertion of the category ‘trademark or brand name’ in section 55(2)(a) effective from 01-04-2002, is to be treated as capital receipt, not revenue receipt. [S.2(14), 2(22B), 2(24(iv), 2(24)(iv), 45, 48, 55(2)]

CIT v. GWL Properties Ltd. (Formerly Gorden Woodroffe Ltd.)(2026) 486 ITR 430/ 183 taxmann.com 26 (Mad)(HC)

S. 45: Capital gains-Business income-Land held as an investment-Profit on sale of land held by assessee should be considered as capital gains and not business profits-Circular No. 4 of 2007 dated June 15, 2007 ([2007] 291 ITR (St.) 384) is also applicable to land. [S. 2(14), 4, 28(i), 260A]