Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Tomorrow Technologies Global Innovation Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 304 Taxman 703 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Considering the objection order u/s 148A(d) was passed-Again objection was raised in response to notice u/s 142(1)-No explanation for delay in filing the writ petition -Interim relief rejected-Matter listed on 7th April, 2025 for further orders. [S. 148, 148A(b),148A(d), Art. 226]

Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 304 Taxman 454 (Mad)(HC) Editorial :Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 169 taxmann.com 542 (Mad)(HC) (SJ)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Jurisdiction of authority who passed order- Interim stay was granted for a period of four weeks.[S. 144B, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151A, Art. 226]

ST Engineering Aerospace Engines PTE Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 304 Taxman 697 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Income-Deemed to accrue or arise in India -Royalties/Fees for technical services DTAA -India-Singapore [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), Art.12, Art. 226]

ITO v. Sanath Kumar Murali (2025) 304 Taxman 55 (Karn)(HC) Editorial : Sanath Kumar Murali v. ITO (2023) 294 Taxman 80/ 455 ITR 370 (Karn(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice- Capital gains- Assessing quantum of escaped income in matters like this, amount mentioned in registered conveyance couldnot be straight away taken as income escaping assessment without deducting cost of acquisition therefrom. Order of single judge was affirmed. [S. 45, 48, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Seahorse Mercantile Company (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 304 Taxman 511 (SC) Editorial : Seahorse Mercantile Company (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 172 taxmann.com 699 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice- Alternative remedy-High Court held that since Assessing Officer had passed well detailed order after rebutting assessee’s contentions, assessee should be directed to adopt alternate remedy of appeal against assessment order-SLP filed by assessee against the order of High Court was dismissed [S. 143(3), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

Seahorse Mercantile Company (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 304 Taxman 277 (SC) Editorial : Seahorse Mercantile Company (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025)172 ITR 162 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice- Order of High Court set aside in view of UOI v. Rajeev Bansal [2024]301 Taxman 238/469 ITR 46(SC) final assessment order was quashed only for purpose of enabling assessee to raise all objections and contentions vis-a-vis impugned notices.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

Monish Gajapati Raju Pusapati v. AUITD (2025) 304 Taxman 382/344 CTR 165 / 248 DTR 17 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Non application of mind-Notice was quashed. [S. 135A,292B, Art. 226]

Amjad Ahmed Shaikh v. ITO (2025) 304 Taxman 377 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice -Dead person-Department had knowledge of demise of assessee -Not bind legal representative- Notice and order quashed.[S.147, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Dy. CIT v. Sterlite Technologies Ltd. (2025) 304 Taxman 345 (SC) Editorial : Sterlite Technologies Ltd v.Dy.CIT (2023) 152 taxxmann.com 381/ (2024) 462 ITR 457 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment -Amalgamation-Notice issued to non-existent company- Order is non-est and void- SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 147, Art. 136]

Osstem Implant India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 304 Taxman 686 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment -With in four years- Cash credits-Cash deposits-Demonetisation-Re assessment notice was held to be justified-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 68, 148, Art. 226]