Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 885 (Ker)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Defect not rectified-Return invalid-Order of rejection u/s 264 is affirmed. [S.44A,139(9), 264, Art. 226]

Sindhu Shree Charles v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 625 (Mad)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Failure to give an opportunity of hearing-Transfer of case not valid. [Art. 226]

Gaurangbhai Chimanbhai Kapadiya v. UOI [2024] 161 taxmann.com 304 / (2025) 482 ITR 649 (Guj)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Carry forward of losses-Assessee must prove genuine hardship-Rejection of application for condonation of delay was affirmed. [S.139(1), 139(3), Art. 226]

Abhilash Panda v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 326 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return-Condonation of delay-Rejection of application for condonation of delay without following guidelines-Not valid. [S. 139, Art. 226]

Shree Jain Swetamber Murtipujak Tapagachha Sangh v.CIT(E) [2024] 161 taxmann.com 114 / (2025) 482 ITR 38 (Bom)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay of 1257 days-Accumulation of income-Form no 10-Delay was condoned-Directed to file application under section 154 of the Act. [S. 11(2), 119(2)(b), R. 17, Form No.10B, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd (2025) 482 ITR 599 (Cal)(HC)

S. 115JB : Company-Book profit-Provision for doubtful loans and advances Loss-Actual and certain-No upward adjustment required. [S.115JB(2)(c)]

Cadence Design Systems (India) v. Dy. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 122 (/ (2025) 482 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparables-Transfer Pricing Officer, including high brand value companies-Functional similarity alone not decisive factor-Exclusion of such comparables in subsequent assessment year-Direction to exclude the two comparables.[S.92CA]

Kanahaya Metal Works v. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 792 (P & H) (HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Cash purchases and receipts for job work on the basis of seized document Estimation of gross profit at 8 per cent.-Question of fact-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 132, 260A]

PCIT v. Madras Pharmaceuticals [2024] 167 taxmann.com 108 / (2025) 482 ITR 522 (Mad)(HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Difference in stock-Reconciliation was filed-Order of Tribunal affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S. 260A]

Smriti Television Media and Films Pvt. Ltd. (through its managing director Bipin Goswami) v. PCIT [2023] 151 taxmann.com 323 / (2025) 482 ITR 737 (MP)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Shares-Failure to prove genuineness of transaction-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 132, 133A, 153C, 260A]