Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ITO v. Arvind Kumar Gupta Through Legal Heir Smt. Uma Gupta (2025) 236 TTJ 482 / 176 taxmann.com 628 (Lucknow)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits]-Share transactions]-Long-term capital gains-Share price of KAF Ltd. had been manipulated by seven entities-Dealy was condoned-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer. [S. 10(38), 45, 254(1)]

DCIT v. Darshan Enterprises (2025) 236 TTJ 22 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits]-Income chargeable to tax-Revaluation of assets]-Member’s capital account-Revaluation of stock-in-trade in the books of accounts of AOP to recognise its present value does not trigger any tax liability either in the hands of AOP or any of its members-Addition was deleted.[S. 4]

ITO v. Narasimha Reddy Duthala (2025) 236 TTJ 169/ 174 taxmann.com 1073 / [2026] 134 ITR 682 (Hyd) (Trib)

S.54F: Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Purchase of land]-Construction of house]-Investment within time limit-Gift of property-It is irrelevant whether the assessee has constructed a building on the entire portion of the land or has only utilised a portion of the land for a residential house and kept the remaining land vacant-Eligible for exemption.[S. 45, 139(1)]

Alauddin v. ITO (2025) 236 TTJ 497 (Agra)(Trib)

S. 54: Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Buildings or lands appurtenant thereto-Purchase of property consisting of four shops and one room-Presence of a single room at the first floor of the commercial structure does not alter the dominant character of the property as the same is expected to be used for incidental and ancillary activities/for commercial purposes-The investment in the said new property does not qualify for exemption.[S.45]

ITO v. NICAF LLP (2025) 236 TTJ 858/ 175 taxmann.com 1001 (Mum)(Trib)

S.47(xiiib): Transaction not regarded as transfer-Capital gains-Conversion of firm into LLP]-Cash credit-Transfer of share capital and reserves of the company to the partners accounts upon conversion to LLP-No credits found in the assessee’s books of accounts-The AO erred in making the addition in the hands of the assessee-Assuming that there was transfer, it is the credit in the partners’ accounts and not in the assessee’s account-Addition was deleted. [S.45, 47(xiiib)(f), 68]

Alauddin v. ITO (2025) 236 TTJ 497 (Agra)(Trib)

S. 45: Capital gains-Sale of joint property-Only 50 per cent of sale consideration can be taken-AO is directed to recompute the capital gain.[S. 48]

Basharat Saleem Rehtoo v. DCIT (2025) 236 TTJ 456 (Amritsar)(Trib)

S. 44AD: Presumptive basis-Income from undisclosed sources-Cash seized during requisition under S. 132A-Not mandatory to maintain books of account]-Addition was deleted. [S.69A, 132A]

ITO v. Welsh and Breton Blenders (P) Ltd. (2025) 236 TTJ 939 / 174 taxmann.com 510 (Hyd) Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source]-Payment of sales commission and cash incentives to retailers-the assessee filed various evidences including confirmation from the parties to prove the genuineness of said expenditure, adverse inference cannot be drawn merely because the notices issued under s. 133(6) were returned unserved by the postal authorities.[S.37(1), 133(6), 194H]

ACIT v. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2025) 236 TTJ 550/ 174 taxmann.com 867 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Commission paid to non-resident agents-Services rendered outside India]-No disallowance can be made for failure to deduct tax at source. [S.9(1)(i), 195]

Credit Gurantee Fund for Micro Units v.NFAC (2025) 236 TTJ 296 (Mum)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure]-Accrual-Provision for claim pay out in respect of guarantee fee-allowable as a deduction.[S. 145]