S.270AA: Immunity from imposition of penalty,etc-Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Authority could not have proceeded to reject the application under Section 270AA before taking a final decision on imposition of penalty under Section 270A-The order was set aside with direction to the authority to consider objections and then take a final decision both on requisites under Section 270A and Section 270AA. [S.270A, Art. 226]

S. 270A: Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Commissioner-Revision of other orders-The assessee has discretion to either file an appeal under section 246A against an appealable order or to apply for revision under section 264. Therefore, where the assessee filed revision under section 264 against penalty order passed under Section 270A, and Commissioner summarily rejected revision without assigning reasons, said order was unsustainable-The penalty order was quashed and set aside. [S. 36(1)va), 143(1)(a), 143(3), 153A, 264(4), 271(1)(c), Art. 226]

S. 270A: Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Notices were not served-Violation of principles of natural justice-Proceedings were quashed and the assessee was to be granted liberty to submit reply to notice issued under section 143(2).[S. 143(2), 272A(1)(d), Art. 226]

S. 268A : Appeal-Instructions-Circulars-Monetary limits-Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Appeal of revenue was dismissed. [S. 260A, 263]

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Long-term capital gains-Sale of unlisted shares-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order is affirmed.[S. 45, 260]

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business expenditure-Revenue expenditure-Advance subscription from a non-resident shareholder towards rights issue, which was later treated as external commercial borrowing (ECB)-Foreign exchange fluctuation loss-Brand Development Expenses-Findings of the Assessing Officer were neither prejudicial to the interest of revenue nor an erroneous judgment-Revision order is quashed and set aside-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order is affirmed.[S. 37(1), 260A]

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Income from other sources-Acquired leasehold/freehold land and building from a company pursuant to an agreement for sale-Certain deductions only on actual payment-High Court affirmed the Order of the Tribunal quashing the revision order-SLP of revenue was dismissed. [S.43B, 56(2)(x), 143(3), Art.136]

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Additional evidence-Amalgamation-Non-existing entity-Additional evidence admitted-Assessment was quashed-SLP of revenue dismissed [S. 143(3), 254(1), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27, Art. 136]

S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Capital gains-Agricultural land-Reasoning of the Tribunal must not be contrary to Constitutional provisions and in disregard of established facts and evidence borne on record-Sale of agricultural land-Not liable to capital gains tax. [S. 2(14)(iii), 45, 260A]

S. 250: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Delay of 113 days-Matter was remanded to the CIT(A) with a direction to allow the assessee to file a fresh affidavit clearly explaining the cause of delay.[S. 246A, Art. 226]