Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


QAI India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 445 (Delhi)(Trib.).

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Fees for technical services-Services rendered and utilised outside India -No tax deductible at source -Disallowance was deleted. [S. 9(1)(vii)(b), 195]

Shapoorji Pallonji Energy (Gujarat) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 427 (Trib.).

S. 37(1): Business expenditure -Business set up but not commenced -Expenditure allowable after setting up of business. [S. 4, 28, 56, 57(iii)]

Sarvodaya Mining Services v. Asst. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 267 (Jodhpur)(Trib.).

S. 37(1): Business expenditure -Ad hoc disallowance -No defect in books of account or audited accounts -Disallowance not sustainable. [S. 44AB, 145]

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 128 ITR 387 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Foreign exchange fluctuation loss -Mark-to-market loss -Reinstatement of assets and liabilities -Allowable as a deduction. [S.28(1)]

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 128 ITR 387 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Grants-in-aid -Expenditure for promotion of housing and urban development -Allowable as a deduction.

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 128 ITR 387 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Prior period expenditure -Crystallisation of liability –Allowable in year of claim, subject to verification. [S. 145]

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 128 ITR 387 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure -Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure-Assessment years prior to 01.04.2015-Allowable as deduction.

Anjana Construction v. ACIT (2025) 128 ITR 148 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Stock-in-trade -Conversion and development expenses-AO disallowed expenditure treating same as capital expenditure-Assessee demonstrated that amount was included in closing stock -Adjustment was revenue neutral -Addition was unjustified.

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 128 ITR 387 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(viii): Eligible business-Special reserve-Interest on FDRs and project loan bonds -Eligible business income -Deduction available.

Atamjeet Singh Sandhu v. ITO (2025) 128 ITR 407 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 36(1)(va): Employees’ contribution to PF/ESI -Prima facie adjustment under section 143(1) -Matter remanded for verification of employees’ and employer’s contributions. [S. 43B, 139(1), 143(1)(a)(iv)]