Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sunil Kapoor v. ACIT (IT) (2024)111 ITR 64 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Brokerage or commission in connection with transfer-Disallowance cannot be made only because agreements with respect to commission services not submitted-Disallowance is not justified-Cost of improvement-New pleas could not be raised before Tribunal [S.45]

Gujarat Infrapipes P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)111 ITR 47 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 47(iii) : Capital gains-Transaction not regarded as transfer-Gift-Company-Living Person capable of making gift-No attributes like love and affection is prescribed-Transfer of plots by Assessee by way of gift deed in favour of another company is valid gift-Not liable for capital gains tax-Person-Living Person. [S. 45,50C, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S. 5, 122]

Gujarat Infrapipes P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)111 ITR 47 (SN) (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Late payment of Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund-Disallowance is justified.[S.36(1)(v)]

Kamal Industries v. ITO (2024)111 ITR 32 (SN) (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Transporters-Each payment was less than Rs 35000/-Matter remanded.

Kamal Industries v. ITO (2024)111 ITR 32 (SN)(Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Only interest and not principal-Form No 26A filed-Delay is condoned-Matter remanded. [S.194A, 201(1)]

CIT (Dy.) v. Creations by Shanagar (2024) 111 ITR 7(SN) (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Commission-Non-resident agents-Payments were made outside India-Not having a permanent establishment in India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Allowable as deduction-DTAA-India-France-Italy-Greece-Lebanon. [S. 37(1)]

Ayesa Ingenieria Y Arquitectura S. A. v. ACIT (IT) (2024) 111 ITR 61(SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Salary-Deducted TDS and deposited it in the government account within the specified time-Disallowance of salary cost is not justified.[S. 192]

ACIT v. Merchant Agri Global P. Ltd. (2024)111 ITR 45 (Trib) (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Audit of accounts-Ad-hoc disallowance-Order of CIT(A) disallowing the ad-hoc disallowance is affirmed. [S.44AB]

Dy. CIT v. CBRE South Asia (P.) Ltd [2024] 163 taxmann.com 256 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employee Stock Option (ESOP)-Allowable as business expenditure.

Shine Star v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib) (UR)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bogus purchase-Rough diamonds-Estimate addition-Estimated the profit @ 3% of the polished diamonds and @5% of the rough diamonds. [S. 143(3)]