Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Chitra Narendra Parmar & ORS. v. ACIT(2025) 237 TTJ 63 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Satisfaction note-Required to be recorded for each assessment year-Consolidated satisfaction note recorded for different assessment years-Bad in law-Approval-Mechanical manner-Order quashed. [S. 153D]

ACIT v. Kasthoori Raja Dhanush (2025) 237 TTJ 23 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Undisclosed income-Noting loose sheet-Seized from third party-Addition was deleted. [S. 132(4) 292C, Indian Evidence Act, S. 114]

DCIT v. Everest Food Product (P) Ltd. (2025) 237 TTJ 913 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Undisclosed income-Manufacturing facility of the assessee does not make it feasible for packaging of the products in small packets-First appellate authority has rightly appreciated the veracity of the evidence furnished by the assessee after verification-Input-output ratio-Order of CIT(A) was affirmed.[S. 132]

Karunya Educational & Research Trust v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 163 / 176 taxmann.com 404 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Undisclosed income-The assessee received software services, and the consideration paid for such services cannot be disallowed. [S. 37]

Atul Vijay Madan v. DCIT(2025) 237 TTJ 220 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-Search-Incriminating documents-Notice issued on the basis of documents seized from a third party not pertaining to the assessee-Reassessment was quashed. [S. 69, 148, 153C]

Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 268 / 177 taxmann.com 118 (Mum) Trib)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Direction of DRP-Final assessment order not in conformity with the directions of DRP-The assessment order is quashed-Non-service of order is not invalid.[S.80IA, 144C (13)]

Kumar Urban Development (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 881 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Non-existing entity-Intimated the AO of the merger-Prior to the insertion of S. 170A w.e.f. 1st April, 2022, there was no provision enabling the filing of a modified return-The order passed by the AO is void ab initio. [S.170A]

Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 716 / 175 taxmann.com 567 (Hyd)(Trib)

S.143(3): Assessment-Limitation-Generation of multiple DINs by AO-Not barred by limitation.[S.153]

Gunjan Kumar Bihani v. ITO (2025) 237 TTJ 440/ 177 taxmann.com 221 (Raipur) Trib)

S. 143(2): Assessment-Notice –No evidence on record regarding any order of transfer under S. 127-The assessment framed by ITO-3(4), Raipur vide his order passed under s. 143(3) in the absence of an order of transfer under S. 127 without issuance of any notice by him under s. 143(2) to the assessee, is without valid jurisdiction, was bad in law; hence quashed. [S.124(3)(a), 127, 143(3)]

Polycab India Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 837 / 175 taxmann.com 707 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 115-O: Domestic companies-Tax on distributed profits-Refund-Entitlement-Refund of Dividend Distribution Tax paid on dividend to International Finance Corporation-Entitled to refund. [IFC Act, 1958]